Literature DB >> 6202414

Studies on DNA damage: discordant responses of rate of DNA disentanglement (viscosimetrically evaluated) and alkaline elution rate, obtained for several compounds. Possible explanations of the discrepancies.

S Parodi, C Balbi, M L Abelmoschi, M Pala, P Russo, L Santi.   

Abstract

Alkaline elution is a well-known method for detecting DNA damage. Recently we have developed a viscosimetric method that is even more sensitive than alkaline elution. Here we report that the two methods, although apparently both revealing alkaline DNA fragmentation, can give dramatically different results for a significant series of compounds. We suspect that alkaline elution might reveal not only DNA fragmentation but also the extent of disentanglement of chromatin structure, whereas this DNA disentanglement rate, when evaluated viscosimetrically , is more strictly correlated with the initiation of DNA unwinding.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6202414     DOI: 10.1007/BF02788627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biophys        ISSN: 0163-4992


  44 in total

1.  Fractionation of DNA from mammalian cells by alkaline elution.

Authors:  K W Kohn; L C Erickson; R A Ewig; C A Friedman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1976-10-19       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  The fluorometric measurement of deoxyribonucleic acid in animal tissues with special reference to the central nervous system.

Authors:  J M KISSANE; E ROBINS
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1958-07       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Cell division and prophage induction in Escherichia coli: effects of pantoyl lactone and various furan derivatives.

Authors:  E P Kirby; W L Ruff; D A Goldthwait
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Activation of nitrofurantoin to a mutagen by rat liver nitroreductase.

Authors:  H S Rosenkranz; W T Speck
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1976-07-01       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 5.  Relationship of DNA tertiary and quaternary structure to carcinogenic processes.

Authors:  P D Lipetz; A G Galsky; R E Stephens
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 6.242

6.  Viscometric detection of liver DNA fragmentation in rats treated with minimal doses of chemical carcinogens.

Authors:  G Brambilla; P Carlo; R Finollo; F A Bignone; A Ledda; E Cajelli
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Occurrence of progressive DNA damage coincident with the appearance of foci of altered hepatocytes.

Authors:  D L Stout; F F Becker
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  In vivo binding of N-2-acetylaminofluorene and its N-hydroxy derivative to the DNA of fractionated rat liver chromatin.

Authors:  M S Walker; F F Becker; L V Rodriguez
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.192

9.  Carcinogenicity of 5-nitrofurans, 5-nitroimidazoles, 4-nitrobenzenes, and related compounds.

Authors:  S M Cohen; E Ertürk; A M Von Esch; A J Crovetti; G T Bryan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Supercoils in human DNA.

Authors:  P R Cook; I A Brazell
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  1 in total

1.  Possible implications from results of animal studies in human risk estimations for benzene: nonlinear dose-response relationship due to saturation of metabolism.

Authors:  S Grilli; W K Lutz; S Parodi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.553

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.