Literature DB >> 6201999

Urodynamic evaluation of transurethral versus transvesical prostatectomy. A randomized study.

H H Meyhoff, J Nordling, T Hald.   

Abstract

In a randomized study of transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) versus transvesical prostatectomy (TVP) in 75 patients a urodynamic evaluation was undertaken before and 6 months following operation. In the TURP group a resection to the surgical capsule was attempted in each case. Operative specimen weights in the two groups did not differ statistically significantly. 5 patients in each group had unexpected prostatic carcinoma. Rapid fill CO2 cystometry did not show any significant differences in bladder function between TURP and TVP patients 6 months following operation. In both groups a high incidence of detrusor instability was observed at follow-up. However, the incidence as well as the severity of the instability had decreased significantly following the two operative procedures. As judged from flowmetry and pressure flow investigation, relief of infravesical obstruction was almost complete in both groups. However, following treatment of postoperative strictures the patients with benign histology in the TVP group compared to the TURP group had higher maximum flow rate values and lower detrusor pressure values. Confidence limits for the differences between the two groups in detrusor pressure and maximum flow rate at follow-up did, however, hardly suggest clinically significantly differences. At urethral closure pressure profile measurement a statistically significantly shorter profile length was measured in TVP patients. The marginal differences in relief or infravesical obstruction might be due to differences in the amount of apical prostatic adenoma following operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6201999     DOI: 10.3109/00365598409182160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0036-5599


  4 in total

1.  [S2e guideline of the German urologists: Instrumental treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].

Authors:  T Bschleipfer; T Bach; R Berges; K Dreikorn; C Gratzke; S Madersbacher; M-S Michel; R Muschter; M Oelke; O Reich; C Tschuschke; K Höfner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Evaluation of uroflowmetry in different groups of patients after transurethral resection of prostatic adenoma.

Authors:  K Bar
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  A J Portis; D R Mador
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Definition of prostatic urethral obstruction.

Authors:  J Nordling
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1994
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.