Literature DB >> 6201326

Preparation of chromosome suspensions for flow cytometry.

G van den Engh, B Trask, S Cram, M Bartholdi.   

Abstract

Certain variables in the preparation of chromosome suspensions for flow cytometric analysis have been investigated. The optimal conditions have been determined. The results of this series of experiments have been incorporated to yield a preparation protocol that gives chromosome profiles with a low amount of small particle debris and few chromosome clumps. The method reduces variability that results from sample preparation. Chromosomes are optimally isolated in a hypotonic solution buffered to pH 8.0. MgSO4 and dithiothreitol added to the buffer reduce the number of clumps and small fluorescent particles. The presence of MgSO4 also stabilizes the chromosomes and precludes the need for other stabilizing agents such as propidium iodide. When the swelling buffer developed in this investigation is used, unstained chromosomes are stable for at least 1 wk if stored at 4 degrees C. The preparation procedure can be used with the DNA stains, propidium iodide, Hoechst 33258, and mithramycin. Preliminary experiments show that this procedure can also be used for bivariate analysis of human and Chinese hamster chromosomes. The importance of this improvement for studies on chromosome damage caused by irradiation or mutagens is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6201326     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990050203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry        ISSN: 0196-4763


  20 in total

1.  Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization in lung cancer as a diagnostic marker.

Authors:  K Truong; M Gerbault-Seureau; M N Guilly; P Vielh; G Zalcman; A Livartowski; A Chapelier; M F Poupon; B Dutrillaux; B Malfoy
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Technical improvements for flow karyotyping by standard FACS 440 flow cytometer.

Authors:  M Vitale; L Zamai; A Antonucci; P Del Grande; S Papa
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Cell cycle dependent chromosomal movement in pre-mitotic human T-lymphocyte nuclei.

Authors:  M Ferguson; D C Ward
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Inheritance of chromosome heteromorphisms analyzed by high-resolution bivariate flow karyotyping.

Authors:  B Trask; G van den Engh; J W Gray
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Monoparametric models of flow cytometric karyotypes with spreadsheet software.

Authors:  J Conia; P Muller; S Brown; C Bergounioux; P Gadal
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  The bovine bivariate flow karyotype and peak identification by chromosome painting with PCR-generated probes.

Authors:  A Schmitz; A Oustry; B Chaput; I Bahri-Darwich; M Yerle; D Millan; G Frelat; E P Cribiu
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  Mass production of genetic markers from a limited number of sorted chromosomes.

Authors:  D Vaiman; E Pailhoux; A Schmitz; C Giraud-Delville; C Cotinot; E P Cribiu
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Application of flow karyotyping in prenatal detection of chromosome aberrations.

Authors:  J W Gray; B Trask; G van den Engh; A Silva; C Lozes; S Grell; S Schonberg; L C Yu; M S Golbus
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Preparation and flow cytometric analysis of metaphase chromosomes of tomato.

Authors:  K Arumuganathan; J P Slattery; S D Tanksley; E D Earle
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Antibody labelling and flow cytometric analysis of metaphase chromosomes reveals two discrete structural forms.

Authors:  B M Turner; A Keohane
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.