Literature DB >> 6197255

A light- and electron microscopic analysis of meiotic prophase in female mice.

A J Dietrich, R J Mulder.   

Abstract

In the paper we describe meiotic prophase of female mice on successive days of embryonic and early postnatal development. For this purpose we used three different techniques on ovarian material, i.e., Giemsa staining for the light microscopic study of chromatin, silver staining for the light microscopic study of the synaptonemal complex (SC), and agar filtration followed by uranyl acetate staining for the electron microscopic study of the SC. In all types of preparation it was impossible to distinguish leptotene stages, and we conclude that if leptotene really exists, it is of very short duration.--Two types of zygotene stages were found: the "normal" one, resembling zygotene stages in male mice, and a second type that has never been described in males and is characterized by, probably stable, unpaired regions together with totally unpaired axial elements of the SC.--The duration of pachytene was found to be 3-4 days, which is considerably shorter than in males. During early diplotene despiralization of the chromatin and disintegration of the axes of the SC were usually found together with desynapsis.--A considerable variation in distribution of meiotic stages was found between different litters in the same day of gestation. Fetuses in the same litter showed no significant variation. However, the oocytes in an ovary did not pass through meiosis synchronously, with differences up several days. The appearance of chromosomes in a highly contracted state could not be interpreted as a preleptotene condensation stage but probably is a mitotic phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6197255     DOI: 10.1007/bf00285860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  29 in total

1.  OOGENESIS IN RABBITS.

Authors:  H PETERS; E LEVY; M CRONE
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1965-03

2.  Oogenesis in the mouse. A study of the meiotic prophase.

Authors:  K BORUM
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Synaptonemal complex karyotyping in spermatocytes of the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus). II. Morphology of the XY pair in spread preparations.

Authors:  M J Moses
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1977-03-16       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Morphological analysis of the division cycle of two Escherichia coli substrains during slow growth.

Authors:  C L Woldringh; M A de Jong; W van den Berg; L Koppes
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  An air-drying method for first meiotic prophase preparations from mammalian ovaries.

Authors:  J M Luciani; M Devictor-Vuillet; R Gagné; A Stahl
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1974-02

6.  Cytochemical studies on chromosome ultrastructure.

Authors:  W F Sheridan; R J Barrnett
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1969-05

7.  Chromosomes of the first polar body in mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  T C Rodman
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  [Meiotic chromosomes of the human female].

Authors:  B Uebele-Kallhardt; K Knörr
Journal:  Humangenetik       Date:  1971

9.  A sequential analysis of meiosis in the male mouse using a restricted spermatocyte population obtained by a hydroxyurea/triaziquone treatment.

Authors:  J L Oud; J H de Jong; D G de Rooij
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1979-02-21       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Oogenesis in antenatal development in man.

Authors:  L F Kurilo
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  17 in total

1.  Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Esther de Boer; Piet Stam; Axel J J Dietrich; Albert Pastink; Christa Heyting
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Meiosis in carriers of heteromorphic bivalents: sex differences and implications for male fertility.

Authors:  A H Peters; A W Plug; P de Boer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Rhox13 is translated in premeiotic germ cells in male and female mice and is regulated by NANOS2 in the male.

Authors:  Christopher B Geyer; Rie Saba; Yuzuru Kato; Amy J Anderson; Vesna K Chappell; Yumiko Saga; Edward M Eddy
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Caspase 9 is constitutively activated in mouse oocytes and plays a key role in oocyte elimination during meiotic prophase progression.

Authors:  Adriana C Ene; Stephanie Park; Winfried Edelmann; Teruko Taketo
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Development of the first meiotic prophase stages in human fetal oocytes observed by light and electron microscopy.

Authors:  M Garcia; A J Dietrich; L Freixa; A C Vink; M Ponsà; J Egozcue
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Nucleolar structures in chromosome and SC preparations from human oocytes at first meiotic prophase.

Authors:  M García; A Dietrich; R Pujol; J Egozcue
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Oocytes from pachytene to dictyotene can easily be analysed in neonatal rodents.

Authors:  A P Singh; S Maerzke; O von Deimling; R Raman; K Sperling; H Neitzel
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Development and behavior of synaptonemal complexes in human spermatocytes by light and electron microscopy.

Authors:  F Vidal; J Navarro; C Templado; S Marina; J Egozcue
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  New data on the synaptic process of Mesocricetus auratus: connecting fibers, telomere association and heterosynapsis.

Authors:  M Guitart; M Ponsà; M D Coll; J Egozcue
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1987-10-15       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  BRIT1/MCPH1 is essential for mitotic and meiotic recombination DNA repair and maintaining genomic stability in mice.

Authors:  Yulong Liang; Hong Gao; Shiaw-Yih Lin; Guang Peng; Xingxu Huang; Pumin Zhang; John A Goss; Francis C Brunicardi; Asha S Multani; Sandy Chang; Kaiyi Li
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.