Literature DB >> 619705

Hemodynamics of increased intra-abdominal pressure: Interaction with hypovolemia and halothane anesthesia.

M Diamant, J L Benumof, L J Saidman.   

Abstract

The hemodynamic interaction of acute hypovolemia and halothane anesthesia in dogs with increased intra-abdominal pressure caused by intraperitoneal instillation of N2, N2O and CO2 was studied. During normovolemia and just basal pentobarbital anesthesia, the response to increase of intra-abdominal pressure to 40 torr consisted of a 35 per cent decrease in cardiac output, which was equal to the decrease in magnitude of inferior vena caval blood flow. During basal pentobarbital anesthesia, the addition of halothane anesthesia (1 MAC) in combination with hypovolemia (15 per cent blood volume loss) depressed the pre-inflation cardiac output more than addition of halothane anesthesia alone or induction of hypovolemia alone. During each of these conditions, superimposition of increased intra-abdominal pressure to 40 torr caused a further 26-43 per cent decrease in cardiac output compared with the pre-inflation value. Therefore, the greatest cardiovascular depression occurred when the animals were both hypovolemic and anesthetized with halothane. There was no difference in the responses to increased intra-abdominal pressure with the different inflating gases at any time. These findings indicate that in the presence of halothane anesthesia or hypovolemia, induction of pneumoperitoneum may cause severe cardiovascular depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 619705     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-197801000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  17 in total

1.  To cut is not always to cure.

Authors:  V Shayani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability during positive pressure pneumoperitoneum: the significance of increased cardiac sympathetic expression.

Authors:  A Bickel; M Yahalom; N Roguin; R Frankel; J Breslava; S Ivry; A Eitan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Effects of prolonged increased intra-abdominal pressure on gastrointestinal blood flow in pigs.

Authors:  F F Gudmundsson; H G Gislason; A Dicko; A Horn; A Viste; K Grong; K Svanes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Abdominal compartment syndrome.

Authors:  T Bin Saleem; I Ahmed
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Physiological effects of pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Julia E Grabowski; Mark A Talamini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Cardiopulmonary effects of using carbon dioxide for laparoscopic surgery in cats.

Authors:  Shannon G Beazley; Kevin Cosford; Tanya Duke-Novakovski
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 7.  Multisystem organ failure secondary to increased intraabdominal pressure.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; G L Bloomfield; B W Saggi
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Manipulation of ascitic fluid pressure in cirrhotics to optimize hemodynamic and renal function.

Authors:  J A Savino; T Cerabona; N Agarwal; D Byrne
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Operative and nonoperative therapy of intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  D H Wittmann
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 10.  Abdominal compartment syndrome: pathophysiology and definitions.

Authors:  Michael L Cheatham
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.