Literature DB >> 6196198

Studies on the quality of pancreatic preparations: enzyme content, prospective bioavailability, bile acid pattern, and contamination with purines.

K H Niessen, J König, M Molitor, B Neef.   

Abstract

Of the 72 pancreatic preparations currently on the market 24 were randomly selected for study and compared with 3 US preparations with different dosage forms. The activities of amylase, lipase, and proteases were measured with natural substrates. Prospective bioavailability was determined using amylase as indicator enzyme. Total bile acid content and distribution pattern were analyzed. The risk of renal changes due to prolonged ingestion of purines was estimated by qualitative and quantitative determination of these contaminants. Enzyme activities differed up to 16-fold. At pH 6, the drugs released the indicator enzyme with very different velocities. The efficacy of the drugs varied between 0.78% and 80.9%. The bioavailability of capsules was generally better than that of coated tablets; pellet capsules were not absolutely superior in this regard. All pancreatic preparations contained the purine bases guanine and hypoxanthine; only one drug had no adenine. Fifteen drugs contained 2.2%-10.6% bile acids by weight. Monohydroxy bile acids, which should not be administered to patients with liver disease, were detected in eight of these preparations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6196198     DOI: 10.1007/bf00445663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  19 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts: pancreatic extracts.

Authors:  A Littman; D H Hanscom
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1969-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  [Quality assessment on 5 enzyme-substitution preparations].

Authors:  W Berndt; K Müller-Wieland; U Staudt; E Meier-Cabell
Journal:  Med Klin       Date:  1970-12-25

3.  An enteric-coated pancreatic enzyme preparation that works.

Authors:  D Y Graham
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  The ins and outs of oral pancreatic enzymes.

Authors:  J H Meyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Factors in the mechanism of diarrhea in bile acid malabsorption: fecal pH--a key determinant.

Authors:  B McJunkin; H Fromm; R P Sarva; P Amin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Controversies in the treatment of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency.

Authors:  E P DiMagno
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Lithocholate cholestasis--sulfated glycolithocholate-induced intrahepatic cholestasis in rats.

Authors:  I M Yousef; B Tuchweber; R J Vonk; D Massé; M Audet; C C Roy
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Studies on human pancreatic lipase.

Authors:  G P Fraser; A D Nicol
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 3.786

9.  Studies on the cause of hyperuricosuria in cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  K H Niessen; A Wolf
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.839

10.  Intestinal concentrations of pancreatic enzymes following pancreatic replacement therapy.

Authors:  I Ihse; P Lilja; I Lundquist
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  2 in total

1.  Enteric coated microspheres of pancreatin in the treatment of cystic fibrosis: comparison with a standard enteric coated preparation.

Authors:  R J Stead; I Skypala; M E Hodson; J C Batten
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics in infants and children. A reappraisal.

Authors:  G L Kearns; M D Reed
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.447

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.