Capsaicin causes release of a substance P-like peptide in guinea-pig inferior mesenteric ganglia.

The effects of capsaicin (0.5-100 microM) on neurones of the isolated inferior mesenteric ganglia (i.m.g.) of the guinea-pig were investigated by means of intracellular recording techniques. When applied to neurones of the i.m.g. that exhibited a slow non-cholinergic excitatory potential (Dun & Jiang, 1982), capsaicin caused in the large majority of these cells a long lasting depolarization accompanied by intense neuronal discharges. During and immediately following the depolarization, repetitive presynaptic stimulation consistently failed to elicit the non-cholinergic depolarization; a partial recovery was observed in relatively few neurones. The fast (nicotinic) excitatory post-synaptic potentials (e.p.s.p.s) were not suppressed by capsaicin in any of these cells. The membrane potential, input resistance and the amplitude of fast e.p.s.p.s in neurones of the i.m.g. that generated no detectable non-cholinergic depolarizations were not affected by capsaicin. Post-synaptic membrane sensitivity to exogenous application of substance P was not altered following capsaicin superfusion even though the latter effectively abolished the non-cholinergic depolarization in the same neurones. Superfusing the i.m.g. with a Ca-free Krebs solution markedly attenuated or abolished the depolarizing effect of capsaicin whereas tetrodotoxin (1 microM) was without effect. Capsaicin was without effect in a few neurones that generated a non-cholinergic depolarization; the latter was not desensitized by bath application of substance P. Capsaicin caused no appreciable effects in neurones of the bullfrog sympathetic ganglia; thus, the fast and slow post-synaptic potentials including the late slow e.p.s.p. the transmitter of which is the peptide luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (Jan & Jan, 1982) were not affected. The results suggest that the depolarizing effect of capsaicin in neurones of the guinea-pig i.m.g. is due to a selective release of ganglionic substance P or a substance P-like peptide in a Ca-dependent manner, and that the non-cholinergic potentials elicited in capsaicin-insensitive neurones may be generated by a transmitter(s) other than substance P.