Literature DB >> 6191298

Atrial synchronized ventricular pacing: contribution of the chronotropic response to improved exercise performance.

L Fananapazir, D H Bennett, P Monks.   

Abstract

In contrast to asynchronous ventricular pacing (VOO, VVI), atrial synchronized ventricular pacing (VAT, VDD, DDD) maintains the normal sequence of cardiac chamber activation and permits a chronotropic response to exercise, thereby improving exercise performance. To assess the separate contributions of these two factors to improved work capacity, 14 patients with implanted programmable VAT pacemakers were exercised according to the Bruce protocol, in three different pacing modes, selected in a random order and on a double blind basis: (a) VAT; (b) chest wall stimulation triggered ventricular (V-CWS-T) pacing, during which the pacemaker was programmed to VAT mode but driven externally using chest wall stimulation at rates fractionally above the patients' atrial rate, thereby providing a chronotropic response to exercise without atrioventricular synchronization; and (c) VOO mode at 70 beats per minute. There was a significant improvement in exercise performance in all patients during both VAT and V-CWS-T pacing as compared to VOO mode; the average increase in work capacity being similar: VAT: 44 +/- 31, (range, 12 to 140) percent and V-CWS-T; 40 +/- 24 (range, 5 to 85) percent. It is concluded that in patients with adaptive pacing systems, the chronotropic response is the major determinant of any improvement in exercise performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6191298     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1983.tb05301.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

Review 1.  Is VVI pacing outmoded?

Authors:  A W Nathan; D W Davies
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-04

Review 2.  Pacemakers and exercise. Current status, future developments and practical implications of physiological pacemakers.

Authors:  N A Estes; G Brockington; A S Manolis; D Salem
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Exercise capacity and spontaneous heart rhythm after transvenous fulguration of atrioventricular conduction.

Authors:  P M Schofield; R J Bowes; N Brooks; D H Bennett
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-10

4.  Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block.

Authors:  K G Oldroyd; A P Rae; R Carter; C Wingate; S M Cobbe
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-04

5.  Usefulness of hemodynamic sensors for physiologic cardiac pacing in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo Marino
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 1.866

6.  Sensors for rate responsive pacing.

Authors:  Simonetta Dell'Orto; Paolo Valli; Enrico Maria Greco
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2004-07-01

Review 7.  Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.

Authors:  J Dretzke; W D Toff; G Y H Lip; J Raftery; A Fry-Smith; R Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.