Literature DB >> 6181979

Interstimulus interval dependence of the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: implications for their neural generation.

R Hari, K Kaila, T Katila, T Tuomisto, T Varpula.   

Abstract

Auditory vertex responses elicited by short tone bursts were compared with their magnetic counter parts. Special attention was paid to the behaviour of the N100 deflection of the response. Electrical responses were recorded from scalp locations Fp2, Fz, Cz, Pz, C4 and T4 and the magnetic responses half way between P4 and T6, at a point where the response has one of its amplitude extrema. Different ISIs (from 1 to 16 sec) were applied in order to differentiate specific and nonspecific evoked potential components from each other. The main results were as follows: (1) The scalp distsribution of the electical vertex response depends on the ISI used: with frequent stimulation there are no marked differences in the amplitudes of N100 between frontal and central areas but with long ISIs the amplitude maxima move to the vertex. (2) The magnetic responses also show a clear ISI dependence. The magnetic counterpart of N100 saturates at shorter ISIs than N100 recorded from the vertex. Independent of the ISI the magnetic counterpart of P200 is constantly very small. On the basis of the different sensitivities of the EEG and MEG to current sources of different orientations it is concluded that the auditory vertex response contains both modality specific and non-specific components. Experimental conditions, especially the ISI used, determine the relative contributions of these components to the potential recorded on the scalp.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6181979     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(82)90041-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  48 in total

1.  Conscious and preconscious adaptation to rhythmic auditory stimuli: a magnetoencephalographic study of human brain responses.

Authors:  F Tecchio; C Salustri; M H Thaut; P Pasqualetti; P M Rossini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Short-term habituation of auditory evoked potential and neuromagnetic field components in dependence of the interstimulus interval.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Karen Zimmerer; Ralph Huonker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neuromagnetic correlates of streaming in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Christophe Micheyl; Jennifer R Melcher; André Rupp; Michael Scherg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Mapping cognitive function.

Authors:  Steven M Stufflebeam; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Language and music: differential hemispheric dominance in detecting unexpected errors in the lyrics and melody of memorized songs.

Authors:  Takuya Yasui; Kimitaka Kaga; Kuniyoshi L Sakai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Neuromagnetic evidence of broader auditory cortical tuning in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Donald C Rojas; Erin Slason; Peter D Teale; Martin L Reite
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Dynamics of cortical responses to tone pairs in relation to task difficulty: a MEG study.

Authors:  Mor Nahum; Hanna Renvall; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Auditory Cortical Plasticity Drives Training-Induced Cognitive Changes in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Corby L Dale; Ethan G Brown; Melissa Fisher; Alexander B Herman; Anne F Dowling; Leighton B Hinkley; Karuna Subramaniam; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Sophia Vinogradov
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Effects of bromazepam on single-trial event-related potentials in a visual vigilance task.

Authors:  T H van Leeuwen; M N Verbaten; H S Koelega; J L Kenemans; J L Slangen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Riitta Hari; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth Barnes; Richard Burgess; Nina Forss; Joachim Gross; Matti Hämäläinen; Ole Jensen; Ryusuke Kakigi; François Mauguière; Nobukatzu Nakasato; Aina Puce; Gian-Luca Romani; Alfons Schnitzler; Samu Taulu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.