Literature DB >> 6176355

Aggravation and provocation of ventricular arrhythmias by antiarrhythmic drugs.

V Velebit, P Podrid, B Lown, B H Cohen, T B Graboys.   

Abstract

Antiarrhythmic drugs may aggravate or even induce ventricular arrhythmias. This type of adverse reaction is becoming more prevalent as the use of antiarrhythmic agents becomes more widespread. In a retrospective analysis of antiarrhythmic drug action, a worsening of arrhythmia was observed in 80 of 722 (11.1%) antiarrhythmic drug tests in 53 of 155 patients being treated for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Aggravation of arrhythmias was defined by occurrence of a fourfold increase in the frequency of ventricular premature complexes, a 10-fold increase in repetitive forms, or the first emergence of sustained ventricular tachycardia coincident with time course of action of the particular drug under study. Such aggravation was noted with each of nine drugs tested: quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, propranolol, metoprolol, aprindine, mexiletine, tocainide and pindolol. The frequency of this complication for a specific drug ranged from 5.9-15.8%. Blood drug concentrations were consistently in the therapeutic range. A study of the variability of ventricular arrhythmia during 48-hour Holter monitoring and exercise stress testing in no instance showed arrhythmia enhancement commensurate with that defining aggravation. Our data suggest that this potentially serious complication is not readily predictable and requires a systematic approach to antiarrhythmic drug testing before a patient is prescribed a long-range maintenance program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6176355     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.65.5.886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  40 in total

Review 1.  Subclassification of class I antiarrhythmic drugs: enhanced relevance after CAST.

Authors:  T J Campbell
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  M Dancy
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  The heart of the matter of opinion and evidence: the value of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Daniel Masvidal; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Benefit-risk assessment of nesiritide in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Therapeutic drug monitoring: antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  T J Campbell; K M Williams
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiarrhythmic drugs. Rationale and current status.

Authors:  R Latini; A P Maggioni; A Cavalli
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Adverse effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  J Caron; C Libersa
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Role of orthotopic heart transplantation in the management of patients with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J P Bourke; A Loaiza; G Parry; C Hilton; S Furniss; J Dark; J Forty
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Electrophysiological testing after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S M Cobbe
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-05-17

Review 10.  A benefit-risk assessment of class III antiarrhythmic agents.

Authors:  Bente Brendorp; Oledyg Pedersen; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Naji Sahebzadah; Lars Køber
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.