Literature DB >> 6174201

Quantitation of response to therapy in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma by serial analysis of plasma gross cystic disease fluid protein and carcinoembryonic antigen.

J S Silva, G S Leight, D E Haagensen, P B Tallos, E B Cox, W G Dilley, S A Wells.   

Abstract

The maximum percent change (MPC) of plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and gross cystic disease fluid protein (CDP) were correlated with response to therapy in 92 metastatic breast carcinoma patients. In patients treated with hormone therapy MPC values were significantly different between patients with disease progression (Prog) and regression (Reg): MPC-CEA for Reg = -72 +/- 7%, for Prog = 396 +/- 150%; MPC-CDP for Reg = -86 +/- 6%, for Prog = 702 +/- 330%, P less than 0.001 in a one-way ANOVA for CEA and CDP. Similar differences were noted in patients treated with chemotherapy. Decreased (greater than 50%) plasma CEA levels were observed in 24/29 (83%) of Reg, 18/35 (51%) stable and 0/49 (0%) of Prog; decreased (greater than 50%) plasma CDP levels were noted in 19/24 (79%) of Reg, 21/28 (75%) of stable and 2/35 (6%) of Prog. Patients with plasma marker decreases greater than 50% had significantly longer responses to therapy (14.2 months for CEA, 14.1 months for CDP) compared to patients with less than 20% decrease (2.0 months for CEA, 0.8 months for CDP), P less than 0.001 in a one-way ANOVA. Decreasing marker levels during the initial six weeks of therapy (negative slope) accurately identified Reg or stable patients: the predictive value of a negative slope was 92% for CEA and 86% for CDP. Rising marker values correctly identified treatment failures (Prog): the predictive value of a positive slope was 90% for CEA and 76% for CDP. These data indicated that changes in plasma CEA and CDP levels reflected increasing or decreasing tumor burden during hormone or chemotherapy treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma. Criteria have been established to predict therapeutic outcome based on the slope of CEA or CDP after six weeks of treatment.U

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6174201     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820315)49:6<1236::aid-cncr2820490627>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  4 in total

1.  Serum tumor marker kinetics and the clinical course of patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  H Sonoo; J Kurebayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  [Diagnostic validity of CEA determination in metastasizing breast cancer].

Authors:  G Krieger; M Prangen; R Klar; M Kneba; G Bandlow; G A Nagel
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1986-08-01

3.  Fluoxymesterone stimulation of tumor marker secretion in patients with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  W G Dilley; D E Haagensen; G S Leight; S Ammirata; S R Davis; J S Silva; N Zamcheck; J J Lokich; S A Wells
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Objective measurement of therapeutic response in breast cancer using tumour markers.

Authors:  J F Robertson; D Pearson; M R Price; C Selby; R W Blamey; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.