Literature DB >> 6172254

Short latency somatosensory evoked potentials to peroneal nerve stimulation: scalp topography and the effect of different frequency filters.

P M Rossini, R Q Cracco, J B Cracco, W J House.   

Abstract

Short latency SEPs to peroneal nerve stimulation were recorded from the scalp of 22 normal adults. The scalp topography and the effect of different frequency filters on these potentials were investigated. Using a wider bandpass (5-3000 Hz), this response usually consisted of 3 positive potentials (peak latencies 17, 22 and 27 msec) followed by a negative potential (peak latency 34 msec). Using a narrower bandpass (150-3000 Hz), these potentials were fractionated into subcomponents and up to 6 positive potentials were followed by an often bilobed negative potential occurring 4-10 msec earlier than the first negative potential recorded with the wider bandpass filters. The negative potential and the preceding major positive potentials were well defined and stable within and across normal subjects which suggests they will be useful in the clinical evaluation of patients with spinal cord pathology and in monitoring patients during surgery. Certain of these potentials recorded using the wider bandpass were often characterized by progressive differences in their peak latencies over the scalp. Evidence is provided which suggests that this occurred because subcomponents of these potentials, observed in recordings using the narrower bandpass had different scalp distributions. Evoked potentials were also recorded from surface electrodes placed over the spine of some of these subjects. These recordings when combined with the scalp recordings provided information concerning the conduction characteristics of SEPs from cauda equina to cerebral cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6172254     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(81)91429-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  10 in total

1.  Application of time-frequency analysis to somatosensory evoked potential for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.

Authors:  Y Hu; K D K Luk; W W Lu; J C Y Leong
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Neural connectivity in hand sensorimotor brain areas: an evaluation by evoked field morphology.

Authors:  Franca Tecchio; Filippo Zappasodi; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Paolo Maria Rossini
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Short- and long-latency tibial somatosensory evoked potentials in cerebral lesions affecting Rolandic leg areas.

Authors:  N S Chu
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Interpretation of the filtered 100- to 1000-Hz electroretinogram.

Authors:  P Lachapelle; J Benoit
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Somatosensory cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of leg nerves: analysis of normal values and variability; diagnostic significance.

Authors:  P Vogel; H Vogel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  [Spinal and subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials after stimulation of the tibial nerve].

Authors:  B Riffel; M Stöhr
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1982

7.  Comparative study of clinical and surgical findings and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and disc protrusion.

Authors:  P Tsitsopoulos; F Fotiou; D Papakostopoulos; C Sitzoglou; G Tavridis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  History of concussion impacts electrophysiological correlates of working memory.

Authors:  Caitlin M Hudac; Cathryn S Cortesa; Patrick S Ledwidge; Dennis L Molfese
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Hand somatosensory subcortical and cortical sources assessed by functional source separation: an EEG study.

Authors:  Camillo Porcaro; Gianluca Coppola; Giorgio Di Lorenzo; Filippo Zappasodi; Alberto Siracusano; Francesco Pierelli; Paolo Maria Rossini; Franca Tecchio; Stefano Seri
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  SEP Montage Variability Comparison during Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring.

Authors:  Christine Hanson; Athena Maria Lolis; Aleksandar Beric
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.003

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.