Literature DB >> 6172034

Factors affecting the rate of hydrolysis of starch in food.

P Snow, K O'Dea.   

Abstract

After accurate determination of the content of available carbohydrate in a wide variety of cereals, as in vitro method was used to study factors that influence hydrolysis rates of starch in foods. Fiber, physical form, cooking, and the possible presence of a natural amylase inhibitor were all shown to affect hydrolysis rates of starch. Fiber only exerted an inhibiting effect on the rate of hydrolysis when it formed a physical barrier to limit access of the hydrolytic enzymes to the starch (as in whole brown rice, for example). Particle size played an important role in determining the rate of hydrolysis. Cooking made the starch much more readily available for enzymic hydrolysis presumably by gelatinizing it. Stoneground wholemeal flour was hydrolyzed more slowly than white flour. This is consistent with the presence of a natural amylase inhibitor that has been isolated from wheat germ in the whole grain. Our results suggest that such amylase inhibitor activity is destroyed by passage through the roller mill, since the starch in wheat germ and standard wholemeal flour (i.e., not stoneground but reconstituted after passage through the roller mill) was hydrolyzed at a rate identical to white flour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6172034     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/34.12.2721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  30 in total

1.  Digestion of starch in a dynamic small intestinal model.

Authors:  M R Jaime-Fonseca; O Gouseti; P J Fryer; M S J Wickham; S Bakalis
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  13CO2 breath test to measure the hydrolysis of various starch formulations in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M Hiele; Y Ghoos; P Rutgeerts; G Vantrappen; K de Buyser
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Glycemic index of grain amaranth, wheat and rice in NIDDM subjects.

Authors:  A Chaturvedi; G Sarojini; G Nirmala; N Nirmalamma; D Satyanarayana
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Physical modification of starch: changes in glycemic index, starch fractions, physicochemical and functional properties of heat-moisture treated buckwheat starch.

Authors:  Charu Goel; Anil Dutt Semwal; Ayub Khan; Sunny Kumar; Gopal Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.701

5.  A comparative study on starch digestibility, glycemic index and resistant starch of pigmented ('Njavara' and 'Jyothi') and a non-pigmented ('IR 64') rice varieties.

Authors:  G Deepa; Vasudeva Singh; K Akhilender Naidu
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 2.701

6.  Use of two varieties of hard-to-cook beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) in the processing of koki (a steamed legume product).

Authors:  C M Mbofung; N Rigby; K Waldron
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 7.  Carbohydrate and diabetes: is the source or the amount of more importance?

Authors:  M J Franz
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  Effect of cyclodextrins and undigested starch on the loss of chenodeoxycholate in the faeces.

Authors:  C Abadie; M Hug; C Kübli; N Gains
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Blood glucose and serum insulin responses to breakfast including guar gum and cooked or uncooked milk in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients.

Authors:  M Uusitupa; A Aro; T Korhonen; A Tuunainen; H Sarlund; I Penttilä
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Effect of commercial rye whole-meal bread on postprandial blood glucose and gastric emptying in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Joanna Hlebowicz; Jenny Maria Jönsson; Sandra Lindstedt; Ola Björgell; Gassan Darwich; Lars-Olof Almér
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.