Literature DB >> 6166860

Quantitation of genetic differences between Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, rhodesiense and brucei by restriction enzyme analysis of kinetoplast DNA.

P Borst, F Fase-Fowler, W C Gibson.   

Abstract

We have compared a total of 44 recognition sites for 12 restriction endonucleases on the 20 kilobase pair maxi-circle of kinetoplast DNA from nine Trypanosoma brucei stocks, four which are known to be infective to man (tow 'gambiense' and two 'rhodesiense' variants). In addition to five polymorphic sites, these DNAs differ in the size of a 5 kilo-base pair region which is cleaved only by one of the restriction enzymes tested and which varies in size over 1.5 kilo-base pairs. Our analysis shows that the maxi-circle sequences of these stocks are very similar, the maximal calculated difference between any two being 3%. A relatively large difference was found between a rhodesiense stock from uganda and one from Zambia, confirming the distinction between northern and southern East African rhodesiense stocks found by analysis of enzyme polymorphisms (Gibson et al. (1980) Adv. Parasitol. 18, 175-246). The gambiense variants could not be identified by unique restriction site polymorphisms, but contained the smallest maxi-circle found thus far in T. Brucei. Our results indicate that T. brucei stocks infective and not infective to man are so closely related as to preclude their differentiation by analysis of kinetoplast DNA. This analysis is useful, however, in providing quantitative information about relatedness of stocks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6166860     DOI: 10.1016/0166-6851(81)90011-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol        ISSN: 0166-6851            Impact factor:   1.759


  10 in total

1.  Minisatellite marker analysis of Trypanosoma brucei: reconciliation of clonal, panmictic, and epidemic population genetic structures.

Authors:  A MacLeod; A Tweedie; S C Welburn; I Maudlin; C M Turner; A Tait
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The molecular epidemiology of parasites.

Authors:  G Hide; A Tait
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1991-02-15

3.  Restriction site detection in repetitive nuclear DNA sequences of Trypanosoma evansi for strain differentiation among different isolates.

Authors:  K P Shyma; S K Gupta; J P Gupta; Ajit Singh; S S Chaudhari; Veer Singh
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2014-09-24

4.  Characterization of the DNA duplication-transposition that controls the expression of two genes for variant surface glycoproteins in Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  L H Van der Ploeg; A Bernards; F A Rijsewijk; P Borst
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-01-22       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  An analysis of cosmid clones of nuclear DNA from Trypanosoma brucei shows that the genes for variant surface glycoproteins are clustered in the genome.

Authors:  L H Van der Ploeg; D Valerio; T De Lange; A Bernards; P Borst; F G Grosveld
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Comparison of maxicircle DNAs of Leishmania tarentolae and Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  M L Muhich; L Simpson; A M Simpson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Localization of kinetoplast DNA maxicircle transcripts in bloodstream and procyclic form Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  K D Stuart; S B Gelvin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Characterization and grouping of Trypanosoma cruzi stocks by DNA base-specific fluorochromes and discriminant analysis.

Authors:  H Mühlpfordt; J Berger
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  Analysis of isolates within species of anuran trypanosomes using random amplified polymorphic DNA.

Authors:  Z R Lun; S S Desser
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Chromosomes of kinetoplastida.

Authors:  L H Van der Ploeg; A W Cornelissen; J D Barry; P Borst
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1984-12-20       Impact factor: 11.598

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.