Literature DB >> 6166447

Scalp-recorded short latency cortical and subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials to peroneal nerve stimulation.

G A Vas, J B Cracco, R Q Cracco.   

Abstract

Short latency SEPs to peroneal nerve stimulation were recorded in 26 normal adults. These potentials consisted of 3 positive potentials (P1, P2, P3) peaking at about 17, 21 and 27 msec, followed by a negative potential (N1) peaking at about 34 msec. P1 and P2 were small and inconsistently recorded. P1 was widespread in its scalp distribution in non-cephalic reference leads, and was poorly defined or absent in scalp bipolar and ear reference leads. P2 was widespread in its scalp distribution in both non-cephalic and ear reference leads. It was poorly defined in scalp bipolar leads. P3 and N1 were consistently recorded from the scalp in both reference and bipolar leads. They were much greater in amplitude than the earlier potentials and had steep potential gradients. They were most prominent around the vertex. They showed significant differences in their peak latencies at different scalp recording locations. The short latency, positive polarity and widespread scalp distribution of P1 and P2 suggest they are far-field events arising in subcortical structures. The longer latency and steep potential gradient of P3 and N1 suggest that they are near-field events arising in cerebral cortical structures. Both P3 and N1 were stable potentials and, therefore, may prove to be clinically useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6166447     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(81)90182-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  7 in total

1.  Cortical and subcortical SEPs following posterior tibial nerve stimulation.

Authors:  H Takahashi; I Suzuki; B Ishijima
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  The optimal interstimulus interval and repeatability of paired associative stimulation when the soleus muscle is targeted.

Authors:  Susanne Kumpulainen; Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting; Jussi Peltonen; Michael Voigt; Janne Avela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Short- and long-latency tibial somatosensory evoked potentials in cerebral lesions affecting Rolandic leg areas.

Authors:  N S Chu
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  [Spinal and subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials after stimulation of the tibial nerve].

Authors:  B Riffel; M Stöhr
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1982

5.  [Spinal and cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials in single and double stimulation of the tibial nerve].

Authors:  H Gerhard; J Jörg; I Selter; H Jansen
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1983

6.  Comparative study of clinical and surgical findings and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and disc protrusion.

Authors:  P Tsitsopoulos; F Fotiou; D Papakostopoulos; C Sitzoglou; G Tavridis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  SEP Montage Variability Comparison during Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring.

Authors:  Christine Hanson; Athena Maria Lolis; Aleksandar Beric
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.