Literature DB >> 6164796

Value of quantitative cell count and amylase activity of peritoneal lavage fluid.

D Alyono, J F Perry.   

Abstract

From January 1974 through July 1979, 1,588 patients underwent diagnostic peritoneal lavage. The test had an accuracy of 98.6%, sensitivity of 94.3%, and specificity of 99.8%. It was true positive in 21.9%, false positive in 0.1%, false negative in 1.3%, and true negative in 76.6%. Fifty-nine patients from the true-positive group had grossly equivocal tests, but had positive lavage results based on quantitative cell count. Thus without cell count the test would have a sensitivity of 78.3%, accuracy of 94.8%, and specificity of 99.8. Eight patients had positive lavage based on WBC count but negative RBC count; all of these patients had bowel injuries. Measurement of lavage fluid amylase resulted in minimal or no improvement in the accuracy (0.06%), sensitivity (0.3%), or specificity (0.0%). Five of six patients with positive amylase levels but grossly negative tests had concomitant positive WBC count. The added cost of the amylase measurement is estimated to be $154,472. Peritoneal lavage has high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Cell counts significantly improve sensitivity. Patients with a grossly equivocal test but with a positive cell count should undergo laparotomy. The lavage-fluid amylase measurement is costly and is of insignificantly yield.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6164796     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198105000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  2 in total

1.  Diagnostic peritoneal lavage for diagnosing blunt hollow visceral injury: the accuracy of two different criteria and their combination.

Authors:  Tomoi Sato; Yasuo Hirose; Hideki Saito; Mutsuo Yamamoto; Norio Katayanagi; Tetsuya Otani; Shirou Kuwabara; Kenichiro Hirano; Hidenori Kinoshita; Toshiharu Tanaka; Yoshihiko Yamazaki; Osamu Aizawa; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Review of pancreatic trauma.

Authors:  K E Glancy
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.