Literature DB >> 6163500

Observer variation in the interpretation of Gram-stained urethral smears: implications for the diagnosis of non-specific urethritis.

J R Willcox, M W Adler, E M Belsey.   

Abstract

A study was carried out to determine whether the diagnosis of non-specific urethritis was affected by differences in the microscopical interpretation of urethral smears between individual observers (interobserver variation) and the same observer on separate occasions (intraobserver variation). A marked degree of both intraobserver and interobserver variation was found which--depending on the diagnostic criteria adopted--could affect both the diagnosis and treatment of many patients attending a clinic of genitourinary medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6163500      PMCID: PMC1045889          DOI: 10.1136/sti.57.2.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Vener Dis        ISSN: 0007-134X


  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic, treatment, and reporting criteria for non-specific genital infection in sexually transmitted disease clinics in England and Wales. 1: Diagnosis.

Authors:  M W Adler
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1978-12

2.  Some problems in microscopy encountered in clinics for sexually transmitted disease.

Authors:  F J Aumonier
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1978-10

3.  Asymptomatic non-specific urethritis.

Authors:  P Rodin
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1971-12

4.  Evaluation of the early morning smear investigation.

Authors:  P D Simmons
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1978-04
  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Diagnosing periprosthetic infection: false-positive intraoperative Gram stains.

Authors:  Margret Oethinger; Debra K Warner; Susan A Schindler; Hideo Kobayashi; Thomas W Bauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Is the urethral smear necessary in asymptomatic men attending a genitourinary medicine clinic?

Authors:  M Shahmanesh; K W Radcliffe
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Asymptomatic men: should they be tested for urethritis?

Authors:  Paddy Horner
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Poor sensitivity and consistency of microscopy in the diagnosis of low grade non-gonococcal urethritis.

Authors:  R Smith; A J Copas; M Prince; B George; A S Walker; S T Sadiq
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Characteristics of inflammatory cells in urethral smears from men with non-gonococcal urethritis.

Authors:  M Shahmanesh
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1989-01

6.  Performance evaluation of automated urine microscopy as a rapid, non-invasive approach for the diagnosis of non-gonococcal urethritis.

Authors:  Marcus J Pond; Achyuta V Nori; Sheel Patel; Ken Laing; Margarita Ajayi; Andrew J Copas; Philip D Butcher; Phillip Hay; Syed Tariq Sadiq
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Profile of sexually transmitted infections causing urethritis and a related inflammatory reaction in urine among heterosexual males: A flow-cytometry study.

Authors:  Stanislav Tjagur; Reet Mändar; Margus Punab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Management of non-gonococcal urethritis.

Authors:  Harald Moi; Karla Blee; Patrick J Horner
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.090

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.