Literature DB >> 6160981

Short latency somatosensory evoked potentials from radial, median and ulnar nerve stimulation in man.

J S Grisolia, W C Wiederholt.   

Abstract

Short latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were elicited by stimulation at the wrist of median, radial, and ulnar nerves, singly or in combination, using normal subjects. Amplitude of P10 was strikingly lower with radial stimulation than with median stimulation, while ulnar-derived P10 was intermediate in amplitude. This difference probably reflects the antidromic firing of motor fibers contained in median nerves as compared with the superficial branch of radial nerve, which is entirely sensory. Beyond P10, there appear to be no significant differences between median, radial and ulnar-derived SEPs. With simultaneous stimulation of several nerves within one arm, larger potentials were sometimes achieved but with poorer definition of P12 and P14. The clinical utility of radial, ulnar, and median stimulation for localizing peripheral lesions derives from the distinct anatomical pathways of the stimulated fibers through the brachial plexus and from the separable motor and sensory components of P10. SEP is less invasive than EMG; this fact, plus its freedom from sampling error, make it potentially more suitable than conventional EMG for sequentially following a patient's clinical course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6160981     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90005-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of cervical SEPs on median, radial and ulnar nerve stimulation.

Authors:  F D'Alpa
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1985-06

2.  Prediction of secondary deterioration in comatose neurosurgical patients by serial recording of multimodality evoked potentials.

Authors:  W A Dauch
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Electrophysiological correlates of changes in reaction time based on stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Bimal Lakhani; Albert H Vette; Avril Mansfield; Veronica Miyasike-daSilva; William E McIlroy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.