Literature DB >> 6153960

Trigeminal evoked potentials in humans.

M H Bennett, P J Jannetta.   

Abstract

Techniques were described for recording trigeminal evoked potentials in humans in response to maxillary gum stimulation. Variations in the responses as a function of stimulating and recording electrode position and stimulus intensity were presented. A standard methodology was proposed in order to obtain the characteristic response repeatedly. The characteristic triphasic wave form consisted, primarily, of an N20, P34, N51 sequence of deflections. Average latencies of components were derived from recordings following stimulation of the asymptomatic side of the face in a patient population. Indirect tests supported the view that muscle potentials did not significantly contribute to the characteristic response. It was concluded that the techniques were suitable for electrophysiological testing of fifth nerve function in routine clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6153960     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90287-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  8 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Analysis of trigeminal nerve disorders after oral and maxillofacial intervention.

Authors:  Sareh Said Yekta; Felix Koch; Maurice B Grosjean; Marcella Esteves-Oliveira; Jamal M Stein; Alireza Ghassemi; Dieter Riediger; Friedrich Lampert; Ralf Smeets
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Neuromagnetic studies of the lip area of primary somatosensory cortex in humans: evidence for an oscillotopic organization.

Authors:  A Mogilner; M Nomura; U Ribary; R Jagow; F Lado; H Rusinek; R Llinás
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The quantitative sensory testing is an efficient objective method for assessment of nerve injury.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Pil-Young Yun; Jong-Hwa Kim; Ji-Young Lee; Won Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-05-03

Review 5.  Real-Time Artifacts Reduction during TMS-EEG Co-Registration: A Comprehensive Review on Technologies and Procedures.

Authors:  Giuseppe Varone; Zain Hussain; Zakariya Sheikh; Adam Howard; Wadii Boulila; Mufti Mahmud; Newton Howard; Francesco Carlo Morabito; Amir Hussain
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Walter Troni
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2022-01-15

7.  Methodology for combined TMS and EEG.

Authors:  Risto J Ilmoniemi; Dubravko Kicić
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  TMS-evoked changes in brain-state dynamics quantified by using EEG data.

Authors:  Tuomas Mutanen; Jaakko O Nieminen; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.