Literature DB >> 6152613

Multiple opioid receptor systems in brain and spinal cord: Part I.

T L Yaksh.   

Abstract

The biological activity of opioid agents reflects their interaction with specific membrane sites. The fact that the drug interaction resulting in physiological responses shows distinguishing characteristics with regard to rank order of agonist potency, affinity of the antagonist for the site acted upon by the agent to produce the effect, tolerance and cross-tolerance, may be interpreted as indicating that different opioids produce their effects by an action on distinctive receptors. Examination of the literature provides support for the hypothesis proposed by different investigators that the physiological effects of the several opioid ligands may be parsimoniously explained in terms of several possibly overlapping receptor classes including mu, delta, kappa, sigma and epsilon. Binding studies examining the affinity of the ligand for a tissue site have in general provided confirming support for these receptor profiles. It is stressed that the majority of the documentation for receptor classes derives from in vitro work. However, a growing number of quantitative studies of the receptors in brain which regulate central nervous system processing are also showing evidence of definable differences in drug action which are comparable to those reported for in vitro bioassays and binding studies. Examination of the pharmacology of the analgesic effects of opioids indicates that the differences in the activity of opioid drugs (such as between mu and kappa agonists) probably reflect the role of different pain processing systems. Though not reviewed, it is likely that a similar complexity underlies the interaction of opioids with neural substrates mediating other functions. Thus different opioid receptors may modulate the same physiological phenomenon because they are on different systems which have a similar output (e.g. spinal reflex inhibition) or they may co-exist on the same neurone. In short, it appears likely that there are discriminable populations of opioid receptors and that no single receptor can be said to modulate a given physiological effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6152613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  15 in total

1.  Central, naloxone-reversible antinociception by diclofenac in the rat.

Authors:  R Björkman; J Hedner; T Hedner; M Henning
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Antinociceptive activity of glycosidic enkephalin analogues.

Authors:  R E Rodríguez; F D Rodríguez; M P Sacristán; J L Torres; F Reig; J M García Antón; G Valencia
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Oligopeptidases B from Trypanossoma cruzi and Trypanossoma brucei inhibit inflammatory pain in mice by targeting serotoninergic receptors.

Authors:  Rafaela Quintanilha Abrahão; Adriano Cardoso Franciosi; Douglas Andrade; Luiz Juliano; Maria Aparecida Juliano; Renata Giorgi; Camila Squarzoni Dale
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.092

4.  Intravenous meperidine for control of shivering during caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia.

Authors:  W F Casey; C E Smith; J M Katz; K O'Loughlin; S K Weeks
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Antinociception effect and mechanisms of campanula punctata extract in the mouse.

Authors:  Soo-Hyun Park; Yun-Beom Sim; Soon-Sung Lim; Jin-Kyu Kim; Jin-Koo Lee; Hong-Won Suh
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 2.016

6.  Effects of competitive and noncompetitive antagonists of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor on the analgesic action of delta 1- and delta 2-opioid receptor agonists in mice.

Authors:  H N Bharagava; G M Zhao
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Effect of fentanyl addition to local anaesthetic in peribulbar block.

Authors:  Mostafa Abdel Hamid Abo El Enin; Ismail Ewis Amin; Ahmed Sayed Abd El Aziz; Mostafa Mohamed Mahdy; Mohamed Abdel Hamid Abo El Enin; Mostafa Mahmoud Mostafa
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2009-02

8.  Release of substance P from the cat spinal cord.

Authors:  V L Go; T L Yaksh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Effect of the NMDA-antagonist, MK 801, on benzodiazepine-opioid interactions at the spinal and supraspinal level in rats.

Authors:  T J Luger; I H Lorenz; C Grabner-Weiss; T Hayashi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Effect of Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb Extract on the Antinociception and Mechanisms in Mouse.

Authors:  Soo-Hyun Park; Yun-Beom Sim; Yu-Jung Kang; Jin-Koo Lee; Soon-Sung Lim; Hong-Won Suh
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.