Literature DB >> 6148931

The impairment of retention induced by beta-endorphin in mice may be mediated by a reduction of central cholinergic activity.

I B Introini, C M Baratti.   

Abstract

beta-Endorphin (0.03 to 1.00 microgram/kg, ip) impaired retention of a one-trial inhibitory avoidance task in a dose-dependent manner when injected into male Swiss mice immediately post-training, as indicated by retention performance 48 h later. The doses of 0.03 and 0.10 microgram/kg significantly impaired retention while the two higher doses (0.30 and 1.00 microgram/kg) did not significantly affect retention as compared with the control group, but tended to increase retention as compared with the dose of 0.10 microgram/kg. Thus, the dose-response curve shows an U-shaped form. The simultaneous injection of naloxone (0.1 mg/kg, ip) not only shifted the dose-response curve to the right but also prevented the tendency to increase retention latencies of the two higher doses. The two lower doses of beta-endorphin did not lengthen latencies to step-through of mice that had not received a footshock during the training while, under these conditions, the two higher doses of the peptide significantly increased latencies to step-through. This effect was prevented by naloxone (0.1 mg/kg). Taken together these results suggest that the effects of beta-endorphin on retention are the consequence of an interaction with opioid receptors and indicate that the right ascending arm of the dose-response curve would probably be due to a punitive effect of beta-endorphin which was also prevented by naloxone. The impairing effect of post-training administration of beta-endorphin (0.10 microgram/kg) on memory was time-dependent, since it was decreased as the training-treatment interval was increased. These results rule out a pharmacological proactive effect of beta-endorphin on retention performance and suggest that beta-endorphin affects memory consolidation. The simultaneous administration of beta-endorphin (0.10 microgram/kg) with the central muscarinic agonist oxotremorine (12.5 or 50.0 micrograms/kg) completely prevented the impairment of retention induced by beta-endorphin, while the simultaneous administration of the central-acting anticholinesterase physostigmine (17 or 68 micrograms/kg) only partially but significantly attenuated the effect of beta-endorphin on retention. Further, the peripheral-acting anticholinesterase neostigmine (68 micrograms/kg) and the nicotinic blocker hexamethonium (5 mg/kg) modified neither retention nor the behavioral effects of beta-endorphin. These results suggest that the impairment of retention induced by beta-endorphin is probably due to an inhibition of acetylcholine release at central cholinergic synapses which are critical for memory formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6148931     DOI: 10.1016/s0163-1047(84)90527-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neural Biol        ISSN: 0163-1047


  8 in total

1.  Differential prevention of morphine amnesia by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides directed against various Gi-protein alpha subunits.

Authors:  N Galeotti; C Ghelardini; A Bartolini
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Reversal of scopolamine-induced amnesia of passive avoidance by pre- and post-training naloxone.

Authors:  D K Rush
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Phencyclidine-induced retrograde amnesia in mice.

Authors:  T Nabeshima; T Kozawa; H Furukawa; T Kameyama
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Interactions between morphine, scopolamine and nicotine: schedule-controlled responding in rats.

Authors:  Xinwang Li; Jun-Xu Li; Charles P France
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 5.  Memory modulation.

Authors:  Benno Roozendaal; James L McGaugh
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  State dependent and/or direct memory retrieval by morphine in mice.

Authors:  M Nishimura; Y Shiigi; H Kaneto
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Modulation of memory by post-training epinephrine: involvement of cholinergic mechanisms.

Authors:  I B Introini-Collison; J L McGaugh
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Effects of different doses of glucose and insulin on morphine state-dependent memory of passive avoidance in mice.

Authors:  M R Jafari; M R Zarrindast; B Djahanguiri
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.530

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.