Literature DB >> 6143970

Pulsed magnetic field therapy for tibial non-union. Interim results of a double-blind trial.

A T Barker, R A Dixon, W J Sharrard, M L Sutcliffe.   

Abstract

Patients with tibial fractures which had remained un-united for at least 52 weeks were randomly allocated to either active or dummy pulsed magnetic field stimulators and treated in full leg plasters for 24 weeks with a non-weightbearing conservative regimen, as is usual with such techniques. Fractures in 5 of the 9 patients with working machines united and fractures in 5 of the 7 patients with dummy machines also united. These early results of this double-blind trial are compatible with a difference in success rate at 24 weeks on active treatment of + 33% to -61% (95% confidence limits) compared with the success rate on the dummy stimulators. The high proportion of fractures uniting in the control group suggests that conservative management of non-union is effective and this may explain much of the success attributed to pulsed magnetic field therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6143970     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92329-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  24 in total

1.  Fracture nonunion.

Authors:  D H Gershuni
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-06

2.  Lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-09-10

Review 3.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasonography versus electrical stimulation for fracture healing: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shanil Ebrahim; Brent Mollon; Sheena Bance; Jason W Busse; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Electromagnetic induction of bone?

Authors:  J Nixon
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-02-16

5.  Trajectory of Parvalbumin Cell Impairment and Loss of Cortical Inhibition in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsun Hsieh; Henry Hing Cheong Lee; Mustafa Qadir Hameed; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Takao K Hensch; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 7.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field in the treatment of tibial fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicol A Walker; Craig R Denegar; Jody Preische
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Electromagnetic stimulation as coadjuvant in the healing of diaphyseal femoral fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alfredo Martinez-Rondanelli; Juan Pablo Martinez; María E Moncada; Eliana Manzi; Carlos Rafael Pinedo; Hector Cadavid
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2014-06-30

Review 9.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. A prospective clinical study and review of the literature.

Authors:  Aggelos Assiotis; Nick P Sachinis; Byron E Chalidis
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Tissue engineered strategies for pseudoarthrosis.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Ugo Trovato; Mattia Loppini; Giacomo Rizzello; Wasim Sardar Khan; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.