Literature DB >> 6132613

Sedation for fibreoptic gastroscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and diazepam.

L Berggren, I Eriksson, P Mollenholt, G Wickbom.   

Abstract

Midazolam, a water-soluble benzodiazepine, was compared with diazepam in fat emulsion (Diazemuls) as sedation for outpatient gastroscopy in a randomized double-blind fashion. Midazolam 0.05 mg kg-1 was found to be approximately equipotent to Diazemuls 0.15 mg kg-1. There were no differences concerning speed of recovery and all patients were considered ready for discharge after 2 h. Venous tolerance was good for both drugs. With the same degree of sedation, midazolam produced a higher frequency of amnesia (60% v. 7%; P less than 0.001) for the endoscopic procedure. Although the patients appeared to prefer midazolam to Diazemuls, this difference was significant only in patients who had not previously undergone gastroscopy (P less than 0.05). The high degree of amnesia with midazolam may be an advantage in sedation for unpleasant procedures like gastroscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6132613     DOI: 10.1093/bja/55.4.289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  12 in total

1.  Rectal administration of midazolam versus diazepam for preanesthetic sedation in children.

Authors:  R Holm-Knudsen; T G Clausen; D Enø
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  Sedation for fibreoptic bronchoscopy.

Authors:  M P Shelley; P Wilson; J Norman
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  A randomized comparison of midazolam and diazepam injectable emulsion in cataract surgery.

Authors:  F Chung; D C Cheng; C Seyone; B J Dyck
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Respiratory and cardiovascular effects in relation to plasma levels of midazolam and diazepam.

Authors:  M Sunzel; L Paalzow; L Berggren; I Eriksson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  A comparison of diazepam and midazolam as endoscopy premedication assessing changes in ventilation and oxygen saturation.

Authors:  G D Bell; A Morden; T Coady; J Lee; R F Logan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Comparison of the amnesic effects of midazolam and diazepam.

Authors:  M J Hennessy; K C Kirkby; I M Montgomery
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Sedation for gastroscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and Diazemuls in patients with and without cirrhosis.

Authors:  N A Hamdy; H J Kennedy; J Nicholl; D R Triger
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Evaluation of the anxiolytic and amnestic effects of diazepam and midazolam for minor oral surgery.

Authors:  N H Luyk; M A Boyle; R P Ward-Booth
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr

Review 9.  New intravenous anaesthetics and neuromuscular blocking drugs. A review of their properties and clinical use.

Authors:  C S Reilly; W S Nimmo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Recovery following sedation with midazolam or diazepam alone or in combination with fentanyl for outpatient surgery.

Authors:  M W Ochs; M R Tucker; R P White; J A Anderson
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.