Literature DB >> 6124760

Biosynthetic human insulin in the treatment of diabetes. A double-blind crossover trial in established diabetic patients.

A J Clark, R O Adeniyi-Jones, G Knight, J M Leiper, P G Wiles, R H Jones, H Keen, A C MacCuish, J D Ward, P J Watkins, J M Cauldwell, A Glynne, J B Scotton.   

Abstract

94 diabetic patients established on treatment with porcine (n = 47) or bovine (n = 47) insulin took part in a double-blind crossover trial, in which 6-week periods of treatment with the appropriate animal insulin were compared with periods of treatment with biosynthetic human insulin (BHI). 6 patients withdrew during the trial, in 3 cases because of hypoglycaemia while taking BHI. In bovine-insulin-treated patients, the mean glucose level (mean of seven capillary-blood samples over 1 day), the modified M index, and total daily insulin requirement were the same on BHI and bovine-insulin treatment. For porcine-insulin-treated patients, mean glucose level and the modified M index were slightly higher on BHI than on porcine-insulin treatment (9.7 vs 9.0 mmol/l and 79.6 vs 65.0, respectively), despite an average increase of 2.3 units/day of BHI after 6 weeks of such treatment. Hypoglycaemic episodes were not significantly more or less frequent on BHI in either group of patients. In both groups fasting blood glucose was higher during BHI treatment than during animal-insulin treatment (14.2 vs 12.8 mmol/l [bovine group]; 12.1 vs 9.6 mmol/l [porcine group]). In bovine-insulin-treated patients blood glucose before the evening insulin injection was higher on BHI than on bovine insulin (11.6 vs 10.0 mmol/l). BHI appears to be a safe alternative to porcine or bovine insulin. Differences in the pharmacokinetics of BHI may account for the observed differences in blood-glucose responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6124760     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90548-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  28 in total

1.  Human insulin and unawareness of hypoglycaemia: need for a large randomised trial.

Authors:  M Egger; G D Smith; A Teuscher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-08

2.  Human insulin.

Authors:  J Pickup
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-01-18

3.  Human insulin.

Authors:  P Home
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-01

Review 4.  Human insulin.

Authors:  J Pickup
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-10-21

5.  Human ultralente insulin.

Authors:  R R Holman; J Steemson; P Darling; W G Reeves; R C Turner
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-03-03

6.  Study of porcine and human isophane (NPH) insulins in normal subjects.

Authors:  D R Owens; I R Jones; A J Birtwell; C T Burge; S Luzio; C J Davies; P Heyburn; L G Heding
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Immunogenicity of semisynthetic human insulin in man. Long-term comparison with porcine monocomponent insulin.

Authors:  A S Luyckx; J C Daubresse; C Jaminet; A Scheen; P J Lefebvre
Journal:  Acta Diabetol Lat       Date:  1986 Apr-Jun

8.  Influence of human insulin on symptoms and awareness of hypoglycaemia: a randomised double blind crossover trial.

Authors:  M Egger; G D Smith; A U Teuscher; A Teuscher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-09-14

9.  Risk of severe hypoglycaemia in insulin treated diabetic patients transferred to human insulin: a case control study.

Authors:  M Egger; G D Smith; H Imhoof; A Teuscher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-09-14

10.  Comparison of human versus porcine insulin in treatment of diabetes in children.

Authors:  S A Greene; M A Smith; B Cartwright; J D Baum
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.