Literature DB >> 6124474

A comparative study of metronidazole and sulfasalazine for active Crohn's disease: the cooperative Crohn's disease study in Sweden. II. Result.

B Ursing, T Alm, F Bárány, I Bergelin, K Ganrot-Norlin, J Hoevels, B Huitfeldt, G Järnerot, U Krause, A Krook, B Lindström, O Nordle, A Rosén.   

Abstract

Seventy-eight patients with active Crohn's disease participated in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial. The study comprised two 4-mo period. The purpose was to test the efficacy of metronidazole in comparison with that of sulfasalazine. As the main evaluation criteria the Crohn's Disease Activity Index and plasma levels of orosomucoid were chosen. In the first period no difference in efficacy as measured by Crohn's Disease Activity Index was found between the treatment groups. The reduction of the plasma orosomucoid level was significantly more pronounced in the metronidazole group. The hemoglobin concentration increased more in this group than in the sulfasalazine group, possibly due to a toxic effect of sulfasalazine. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate decreased similarly with both drugs. In 15 patients who had active disease throughout the first period, Crohn's Disease Activity Index decreased significantly in the second period for those who switched to metronidazole, but not for those who switched to sulfasalazine. After crossover, no apparent further change in Crohn's Disease Activity Index occurred in either of the treatment groups among patients who had responded favorably in the first period. The plasma concentration of orosomucoid increased significantly among the patients in the sulfasalazine group but not in the metronidazole group. It is therefore concluded that metronidazole is slightly more effective than sulfasalazine in the treatment of crohn's disease. It is worthwhile switching the drug regimen from sulfasalazine, when it fails, to metronidazole, but not from metronidazole to sulfasalazine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6124474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  64 in total

1.  New treatments for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  David S Rampton; D Phil
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Management of difficult inflammatory bowel disease: where are we now?

Authors:  DS Rampton
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Nonobstructing Crohn's Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-04

4.  Treatment of Crohn's Disease of Inflammatory, Stenotic, and Fistulizing Phenotypes.

Authors:  Marla C. Dubinsky; Phillip P. Fleshner
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-06

Review 5.  Drug therapy of ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  B Crotty; D P Jewell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Targeting Therapy in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Marla C. Dubinsky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-10

7.  [New therapeutic approaches to special diseases of the small intestine].

Authors:  M Schumann; K Herrlinger; M Zeitz; E F Stange
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 8.  A possible link between Crohn's disease and ankylosing spondylitis via Klebsiella infections.

Authors:  Alan Ebringer; Taha Rashid; Harmale Tiwana; Clyde Wilson
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 9.  [Pharmacologic therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases: hopes, disappointments].

Authors:  S Nikolaus; S Schreiber; U R Fölsch
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 10.  Management of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  M Nayar; J M Rhodes
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.