| Literature DB >> 6122111 |
J D Swales, R F Bing, A Heagerty, J E Pohl, G I Russell, H Thurston.
Abstract
126 patients with blood pressure which was unacceptably high despite a conventional stepped-care regimen (diuretic, beta-blocker, and vasodilator) took part in a comparative assessment of different approaches to the treatment of refractory hypertension. One of four regimens was used: oral diazoxide, minoxidil, captopril, or quadruple therapy (diuretic + beta-adrenoceptor blocker + hydralazine + prazosin). Despite the severity of hypertension, blood pressure could be controlled in almost all these patients, and no patient died from cerebrovascular disease while on treatment. 2 patients died of renal failure and 5 patients required long-term haemodialysis. Ischaemic heart disease remained a problem and caused the death of 10 patients. Diazoxide was the most effective treatment but was the most difficult and unpleasant to use. Captopril was the best-tolerated but failed to control blood pressure in 6 of 15 patients. Our experience indicates that there are now sufficient therapeutic alternatives to achieve acceptable blood-pressure control in almost all patients with "refractory" hypertension, although no treatment is ideal.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1982 PMID: 6122111 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92162-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet ISSN: 0140-6736 Impact factor: 79.321