Literature DB >> 6115596

The use of H1 and H2 histamine antagonists with morphine anesthesia: a double-blind study.

D M Philbin, J Moss, C W Akins, C E Rosow, K Kono, R C Schneider, T R VerLee, J J Savarese.   

Abstract

High doses of morphine can produce significant cardiovascular effects generally attributed to histamine release. The authors examined the possibility that H1 and H2 histamine antagonists might prove beneficial in preventing these responses. In a randomized double-blind study, four groups of 10 patients each received 1 mg/kg morphine and either a placebo, diphenhydramine (H1), cimetidine (H2), or both of the histamine antagonists. The morphine-placebo group demonstrated a marked elevation in plasma histamine levels (880 +/- 163 to 7437 +/- 2684 pg/ml), a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (15.5 to 9.0 l torr/(l . min-1) and diastolic BP (71 +/- 3 to 45 +/- 4 torr) and an increase in cardiac index (CI) (2.4 +/- 0.2 to 3.0 +/- 0.21 . min-1 . m-2). The administration of either cimetidine or diphenhydramine with morphine provided minimal protection. Those patients who received morphine and both antagonists demonstrated significant attenuation of these responses (CI 2.5 +/- 0.2 to 2.5 +/- 0.1 l . min-1 . m-2; SVR 17.4 to 14.6 torr/(l . min-1) although plasma histamine levels showed a comparable increase (1059 +/- 222 to 7653 +/- 4242 pg/ml). These data demonstrate directly that many of the hemodynamic effects of morphine can be attributed to histamine release. They further demonstrate that significant hemodynamic protection can be obtained by the use of histamine antagonists and the combination of H1 and H2 antagonists is superior to either given alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6115596     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198109000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  22 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of anaphylactic reactions to anaesthetic drugs.

Authors:  Malcolm M Fisher; Gordon S Doig
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Pharmacological considerations for conscious sedation: clinical applications of receptor function.

Authors:  D E Becker
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr

Review 3.  Anaphylactoid reactions to narcotic analgesics.

Authors:  M M Fisher; D G Harle; B A Baldo
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1991 Fall-Winter

Review 4.  Management of anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions during anesthesia.

Authors:  B Eon; L Papazian; F Gouin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1991 Fall-Winter

5.  Prophylactic administration of histamine1 and histamine2 receptor blockers in the prevention of protamine-related haemodynamic effects.

Authors:  J Kambam; R Meszaros; W Merrill; J Stewart; B E Smith; H Bender
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Functional differences between human cutaneous mast cells and basophils: a comparison of morphine-induced histamine release.

Authors:  J M Ebertz; J M Hermens; J C McMillan; H Uno; C Hirshman; J M Hanifin
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1986-08

Review 7.  [Processes of perioperative risk from the viewpoint of the anesthesiologist].

Authors:  A Doenicke; W Lorenz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1987

Review 8.  Anaesthetic premedication: aims, assessment and methods.

Authors:  T H Madej; R T Paasuke
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Potentiation of vancomycin-induced histamine release by muscle relaxants and morphine in rats.

Authors:  H Shuto; M Sueyasu; S Otsuki; T Hara; Y Tsuruta; Y Kataoka; R Oishi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Plasma histamine and hemodynamic responses following administration of nalbuphine and morphine.

Authors:  S M Muldoon; M A Donlon; R Todd; E A Helgeson; W Freas
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1984-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.