Literature DB >> 6113320

Second opinions on elective surgery. The Cornell/New York Hospital study.

E G McCarthy, M L Finkel, H S Ruchlin.   

Abstract

Programmes for securing second opinions on elective surgery are designed to help patients make a more informed decision once elective surgery has been recommended. The patient is assessed before surgery is performed, which allows alternatives to be considered. The Cornell/New York Hospital second opinion programme is the only one to have accumulated statistics on voluntary and mandatory programmes. Data from the mandatory programme showed that 18.7% of the 6799 patients screened were no confirmed for surgery. Follow-up data at one year showed that 67.5% of the unconfirmed patients had not in fact had surgery. A cost-benefit analysis showed that for every $1.00 spent there was a benefit of $2.63.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6113320     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92527-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  8 in total

Review 1.  Unnecessary surgery.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Do first opinions affect second opinions?

Authors:  Geva Vashitz; Joseph S Pliskin; Yisrael Parmet; Yona Kosashvili; Gal Ifergane; Shlomo Wientroub; Nadav Davidovitch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Second opinion behaviour among Japanese primary care patients.

Authors:  T Sato; M Takeichi; T Hara; S Koizumi
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Overtreatment in surgery: discussion paper.

Authors:  F G Fowkes
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Seeking a second medical opinion: composition, reasons and perceived outcomes in Israel.

Authors:  Liora Shmueli; Nadav Davidovitch; Joseph S Pliskin; Ran D Balicer; Igal Hekselman; Geva Greenfield
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2017-12-08

6.  The behaviors of seeking a second opinion from other health-care professionals and the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine in gynecologic cancer patients.

Authors:  K F Tam; D K L Cheng; T Y Ng; H Y S Ngan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  The cost-saving effect of centralized histological reviews with soft tissue and visceral sarcomas, GIST, and desmoid tumors: The experiences of the pathologists of the French Sarcoma Group.

Authors:  Lionel Perrier; Pauline Rascle; Magali Morelle; Maud Toulmonde; Dominique Ranchere Vince; Axel Le Cesne; Philippe Terrier; Agnès Neuville; Pierre Meeus; Fadila Farsi; Françoise Ducimetière; Jean-Yves Blay; Isabelle Ray Coquard; Jean-Michel Coindre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Value of a Second Opinion for Breast Cancer Patients Referred to a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Designated Cancer Center with a Multidisciplinary Breast Tumor Board.

Authors:  Denise Garcia; Laura S Spruill; Abid Irshad; Jennifer Wood; Denise Kepecs; Nancy Klauber-DeMore
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 5.344

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.