Literature DB >> 6110090

Presymptomatic central nervous system therapy in previously untreated childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: comparison of 1800 rad and 2400 rad. A report for Children's Cancer Study Group.

M E Nesbit, H N Sather, L L Robison, J Ortega, P S Littman, G J D'Angio, G D Hammond.   

Abstract

The Children's Cancer Study Group has organised two therapeutic clinical trials designed to evaluate the efficacy of various types and doses of CNS prophylaxis in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Of 478 previously untreated patients who subsequently achieved an initial marrow remission, 299 were randomised to receive 2400 rad craniospinal radiation therapy (RT) or 2400 rad cranial RT plus intrathecal methotrexate (i.t. MTX) while the remaining 179 patients were randomised between the same two regimens using a radiation dose of 1800 rad. All patients received identical induction and maintenance chemotherapy. Comparison of the two studies indicated that reduction of the dose of CNS radiation from 2400 rad to 1800 rad did not result in a significant increase in the frequency of CNS relapse, bone marrow relapse, or death. Moreover, no significant differences were observed when analyses were done within prognostic risk groups. Randomised trials with RT doses lower than 1800 rad or with i.t. chemotherapy alone should be considered to determine the most effective and least toxic forms of CNS prophylaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6110090     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)91849-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  20 in total

Review 1.  Central nervous system-directed therapy in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and studies of neurobehavioral outcome: Children's Cancer Group trials.

Authors:  Thomas A Kaleita
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Cranial irradiation in childhood lymphoblastic leukemia: time for reappraisal.

Authors:  J M Chessells
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-09-14

Review 3.  Lessons from the past: opportunities to improve childhood cancer survivor care through outcomes investigations of historical therapeutic approaches for pediatric hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Melissa M Hudson; Joseph P Neglia; William G Woods; John T Sandlund; Ching-Hon Pui; Larry E Kun; Leslie L Robison; Daniel M Green
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Current management of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  H Ekert
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 5.  Treatment of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: progress achieved and challenges remaining.

Authors:  Paul S Gaynon
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  Neurotoxicity in lymphoblastic leukaemia: comparison of oral and intramuscular methotrexate and two doses of radiation.

Authors:  J M Chessells; T C Cox; B Kendall; N P Cavanagh; L Jannoun; S Richards
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Are cognitive and educational development affected by age at which prophylactic therapy is given in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia?

Authors:  L Jannoun
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Oral methotrexate is as effective as intramuscular in maintenance therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  J M Chessells; A D Leiper; K Tiedemann; R M Hardisty; S Richards
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Medulloblastoma: are we overtreating?

Authors:  S Vijayakumar; R Muller-Runkel
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  Longitudinal growth and final height in long-term survivors of childhood leukaemia.

Authors:  A Cicognani; E Cacciari; P Rosito; A F Mancini; G Carlă; M Mandini; G Paolucci
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.