Literature DB >> 6106242

The persistences of vision.

M Coltheart.   

Abstract

Human observers continue to experience a visual stimulus for some time after the offset that stimulus. The neural activity evoked by a visual stimulus continues for some time after its offset. The information extracted from a visual stimulus continues to be registered in a visual form of memory ('iconic memory') for some time after its offset. We may thus distinguish three distinct senses in which a visual stimulus may be said to persist after its physical offset: there is phenomenological persistence, neural persistence and informational persistence. Various assumptions have been made about the relation between these forms of visual persistence. The most frequent assumption is that they correspond simply to three different methods for studying a single entity. Detailed consideration of what is known about the properties of these three forms of persistence suggests, however, that this assumption is not correct. It can reasonably be proposed that visible persistence is the phenomenological correlate of neural persistence occurring at various stages of the visual system: photoreceptors, ganglion cells and the stereopsis system. Iconic memory on the other hand, does not correspond to visible persistence, nor to neural persistence in any stage of the visual system. Recent work, in fact, suggests that iconic memory is a property of some relatively late stage in the visual information-processing system, rather than being a peripheral sensory buffer store. This suggestion raises some fundamental theoretical issues concerning the psychology of visual perception, issues with which cognitive psychology has yet to come to grips.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6106242     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1980.0082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  20 in total

1.  Does visual short-term memory have a high-capacity stage?

Authors:  Michi Matsukura; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

Review 2.  Single-trial analysis of neuroimaging data: inferring neural networks underlying perceptual decision-making in the human brain.

Authors:  Paul Sajda; Marios G Philiastides; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Time courses in visual-information processing: some theoretical considerations.

Authors:  M P Hagenzieker; A H van der Heijden
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

Review 4.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

5.  An object-mediated updating account of insensitivity to transsaccadic change.

Authors:  A Caglar Tas; Cathleen M Moore; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Letters persistence after physical offset: visual word form area and left planum temporale. An fMRI study.

Authors:  Francesco Barban; Gian Daniele Zannino; Emiliano Macaluso; Carlo Caltagirone; Giovanni A Carlesimo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Three-dimensional display technologies.

Authors:  Jason Geng
Journal:  Adv Opt Photonics       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 20.107

8.  Attention scaling modulates the effective capacity of visual sensory memory.

Authors:  Leon Gmeindl; Lisa N Jefferies; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-10-27

9.  Prestimulus alpha power predicts fidelity of sensory encoding in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Bin Lou; Yun Li; Marios G Philiastides; Paul Sajda
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Attentive and pre-attentive processes in change detection and identification.

Authors:  Howard C Hughes; Gideon Paul Caplovitz; Rebecca A Loucks; Robert Fendrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.