Literature DB >> 6102296

Ecological considerations in the creation and the use of child growth standards.

H Goldstein, J M Tanner.   

Abstract

There is no proper substitute for a country, especially a developing country, having its own child growth standards or norms for clinical use, based on a representative sample of the population. Separate standards may be derived for subgroups of the population, but the application to the whole population of standards based on an economically privileged group is inappropriate, as is the use of an international standard. The screening or clinical use of growth standards should be sharply distinguished from the use of growth measurements to compare disadvantaged with privileged groups or populations. In particular, the use of growth standards to screen individual children should not divert attention from the need to change existing differences between disadvantaged and privileged groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6102296     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91067-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  9 in total

1.  The health care needs of southeast asian refugees.

Authors:  J M Morse; A J Edwards; T Kappagoda
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Growth and malnutrition among preschool children in Democratic Yemen.

Authors:  G Bågenholm; B Kristiansson; A A Nasher
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Use and interpretation of anthropometric indicators of nutritional status. WHO Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 4.  Weight monitoring of breastfed babies in the UK - centile charts, scales and weighing frequency.

Authors:  Magda Sachs; Fiona Dykes; Bernie Carter
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Arm muscle and fat in the evaluation of nutritional status. A study of African pre-school children in three different environments.

Authors:  J P Manshande; J Vuylsteke; R Vlietinck; R Eeckels
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  The risk of obesity by assessing infant growth against the UK-WHO charts compared to the UK90 reference: findings from the Born in Bradford birth cohort study.

Authors:  William Johnson; John Wright; Noël Cameron
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  Author reply.

Authors:  V Kumaravel; S Vanishree; M Anitharani; Bwc Sathiyasekaran
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-05

8.  Centile curves and reference values for height, body mass, body mass index and waist circumference of Peruvian children and adolescents.

Authors:  Alcibíades Bustamante; Duarte Freitas; Huiqi Pan; Peter T Katzmarzyk; José Maia
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Sibling Competition & Growth Tradeoffs. Biological vs. Statistical Significance.

Authors:  Karen L Kramer; Amanda Veile; Erik Otárola-Castillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.