Literature DB >> 6094994

Determinants of case survival for cancers of the lung, colon, breast and cervix in South Australia.

A Bonett, D Roder, A Esterman.   

Abstract

Survival rates for cancers of the lung, colon and female breast, and for invasive lesions of the cervix have been analysed according to age, place of residence, country of birth, socioeconomic status, and where applicable, by sex and histological type and were found to be negatively related to age. For patients with cancers of the colon and cervix, survival rates were lower in country residents than in those of metropolitan Adelaide. Low socioeconomic status was associated with a lower survival rate for patients with colonic cancers and female breast cancers; a similar trend was suggested for those with cancers of the cervix. Higher survival rates were found for patients with squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the lung, and mucinous tumours of the breast. Higher survival rates for patients with breast tumours were associated with small tumour size at diagnosis. In some overseas-born populations, survival rates for patients with lung cancers and cervical cancers were higher than those in the Australian-born population. This warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6094994     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1984.tb113226.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  8 in total

1.  Measuring social class differences in cancer patient survival: is it necessary to control for social class differences in general population mortality? A Finnish population-based study.

Authors:  P W Dickman; A Auvinen; E T Voutilainen; T Hakulinen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Effect of socioeconomic status on survival from cervical cancer in Sheffield.

Authors:  P C Milner; M Watts
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario, and Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan areas.

Authors:  K M Gorey; E J Holowaty; G Fehringer; E Laukkanen; A Moskowitz; D J Webster; N L Richter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Cancer patient survival by socioeconomic status in seven countries: a review for six common cancer sites [corrected].

Authors:  C T Schrijvers; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Survival of breast cancer patients from Piedmont, Italy.

Authors:  P Boffetta; F Merletti; R Winkelmann; C Magnani; A P Cappa; B Terracini
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Socioeconomic Differences and Lung Cancer Survival-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Isabelle Finke; Gundula Behrens; Linda Weisser; Hermann Brenner; Lina Jansen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival.

Authors:  M Kogevinas; M G Marmot; A J Fox; P O Goldblatt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Deprivation and survival from breast cancer.

Authors:  C T Schrijvers; J P Mackenbach; J M Lutz; M J Quinn; M P Coleman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.