Literature DB >> 6087753

Infection prophylaxis in acute leukemia. Comparative effectiveness of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, ketoconazole, and a combination of the two.

E Estey, A Maksymiuk, T Smith, V Fainstein, M Keating, K B McCredie, E J Freireich, G P Bodey.   

Abstract

In a comparative study of infection prophylaxis, patients with acute leukemia receiving remission induction therapy were assigned either no prophylaxis, sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, ketoconazole, or the combination of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim and ketoconazole. Both sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim and the combination of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim and ketoconazole substantially reduced the overall incidence of infection consequent to a marked decrease in bacterial infection. However, sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim were associated with an increased rate of fungal infection, while ketoconazole decreased this complication. No form of prophylaxis reduced infectious mortality or increased the complete remission rate. However, because of its effect in reducing infectious morbidity, we conclude that patients with acute leukemia receiving remission induction treatment should be given antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6087753     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.144.8.1562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  13 in total

Review 1.  Antifungal prophylaxis during neutropenia and immunodeficiency.

Authors:  O Lortholary; B Dupont
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Selective decontamination in neutropenic patients.

Authors:  E Kurrle; T Schmeiser; W Kern
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies. Recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology.

Authors:  Oliver A Cornely; Angelika Böhme; Dieter Buchheidt; Hermann Einsele; Werner J Heinz; Meinolf Karthaus; Stefan W Krause; William Krüger; Georg Maschmeyer; Olaf Penack; Jörg Ritter; Markus Ruhnke; Michael Sandherr; Michal Sieniawski; Jörg-Janne Vehreschild; Hans-Heinrich Wolf; Andrew J Ullmann
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Candidiasis.

Authors:  F Meunier
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Use of the quinolones for the prophylaxis and therapy of infections in immunocompromised hosts.

Authors:  G Maschmeyer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Selective gut decontamination with nalidixic acid or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for infection prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients: relationship of efficacy to antimicrobial spectrum and timing of administration.

Authors:  E J Bow; E Rayner; B A Scott; T J Louie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Problems in antifungal chemotherapy.

Authors:  D A Stevens
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 8.  Antibacterial therapy in patients with malignancies.

Authors:  K H Mayer; S M Opal
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of ketoconazole.

Authors:  T K Daneshmend; D W Warnock
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Prevention of infection in acute leukemia: a prospective randomized study on the efficacy of two different drug regimens for antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Authors:  E Kurrle; A W Dekker; W Gaus; E Haralambie; D Krieger; M Rozenberg-Arska; H G de Vries-Hospers; D van der Waaij; F Wendt
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.