Literature DB >> 6086858

On the origin of synkinesis in hemifacial spasm: results of intracranial recordings.

A R Møller, P J Jannetta.   

Abstract

Recordings were made from facial muscles and the facial nerve near its entrance into the brain stem in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS). The purpose of this study was to determine if the synkinesis commonly seen in patients with HFS could be linked to ephaptic transmission at the presumed site of the lesion (at the root entry zone (REZ) of the facial nerve). When the mandibular branch of the facial nerve was electrically stimulated, a response could be recorded from the orbicularis oculi muscles during the operation. The latency of the earliest response was 11.03 +/- 0.66 msec (mean response of seven patients +/- standard deviation (SD]. With equivalent stimulation a response could also be recorded from the facial nerve near the REZ; the latency of this response was 3.87 +/- 0.36 msec. Stimulation of the facial nerve at the same location yielded a response from the orbicularis oculi muscle, with a latency of 4.65 +/- 0.25 msec. The latency of the earliest response from the orbicularis oculi muscle to stimulation of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve (11.3 msec) is thus larger than the sum of the conduction times from the points of stimulation of the marginal mandibular branch to the REZ of the facial nerve and from the REZ of the facial nerve to the orbicularis oculi muscle (8.52 +/- 0.38 msec). It is therefore regarded as unlikely that the earliest response of the orbicularis oculi muscle to stimulation of the mandibular branch of the facial nerve is a result of "crosstalk" in the facial nerve at a location near the REZ, and it seems more likely that HFS caused by injury of the facial nerve is a result of reverberant activity in the facial motonucleus, possibly caused by mechanisms that are similar to kindling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6086858     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.3.0569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  33 in total

1.  Abnormal muscle responses in hemifacial spasm: F waves or trigeminal reflexes?

Authors:  S Misawa; S Kuwabara; K Ogawara; T Hattori
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Hemifacial spasm: a neurosurgical perspective.

Authors:  Doo-Sik Kong; Kwan Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2007-11-20

3.  Continuous intraoperative monitoring of abnormal muscle response in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm; a real-time navigator for complete relief.

Authors:  Seiichiro Hirono; Iwao Yamakami; Motoki Sato; Ken Kado; Kazumasa Fukuda; Takao Nakamura; Yoshinori Higuchi; Naokatsu Saeki
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Intra-operative monitoring by facial electromyographic responses during microvascular decompressive surgery for hemifacial spasm.

Authors:  T Isu; K Kamada; S Mabuchi; A Kitaoka; T Ito; M Koiwa; H Abe
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Residual hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression: prognostic factors with emphasis on preoperative psychological state.

Authors:  Yichao Jin; Changyi Zhao; Shanshan Su; Xiaohua Zhang; Yongming Qiu; Jiyao Jiang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Evaluation of proximal facial nerve conduction by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  T N Schriefer; K R Mills; N M Murray; C W Hess
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  The value of lateral spread response monitoring in predicting the clinical outcome after microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: a prospective study on 100 patients.

Authors:  Ahmed El Damaty; Christian Rosenstengel; Marc Matthes; Joerg Baldauf; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Investigation of unilateral facial weakness: magnetic stimulation of the proximal facial nerve and of the face-associated motor cortex.

Authors:  B U Meyer; T C Britton; R Benecke
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Facial nerve demyelination and vascular compression are both needed to induce facial hyperactivity: a study in rats.

Authors:  A Kuroki; A R Møller
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 10.  The cranial nerve vascular compression syndrome: II. A review of pathophysiology.

Authors:  A R Møller
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.