Literature DB >> 6086221

Activity of cefotaxime against enterococci.

R C Moellering, G M Eliopoulos.   

Abstract

The third-generation cephalosporins as a group are characterized by spectra of activity that are the broadest of the currently available antibiotics (Farber and Moellering, 1982). These agents provide excellent coverage of infections due to Enterobacteriaceae. They also exhibit good (but variable) activity against a number of "nonfermentors" such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and many of them are likewise active against anaerobes, including Bacteroides fragilis (Farber and Moellering, 1982). As a class, the third generation cephalosporins are less active against gram-positive organisms, but in spite of this they have been clinically effective against infections due to S. aureus and many other gram-positive cocci (Saito, 1982). Enterococci, however, have proven to be a difficult organism for the third-generation cephalosporins. None of the presently available compounds exhibits very good activity against these organisms in vitro (Fass, 1983). Given this fact and the broad spectrum of activity of these compounds against other organisms, there is a significant potential for enterococcal superinfection in patients treated with the third-generation cephalosporins. Indeed, serious enterococcal infection has clearly been documented in patients treated with some third-generation cephalosporins (Moellering, 1982; Yu, 1981). Although none of the presently available third-generation cephalosporins exhibits therapeutically useful activity against enterococci, currently available data suggest that there may be differences among these compounds in their ability to cause (or prevent) this complication. For instance, there are more published reports of enterococcal superinfection in patients treated with moxalactam than in patients receiving the other third-generation cephalosporins.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6086221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.

Authors:  P A Todd; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Gram-positive superinfections following beta-lactam chemotherapy: the significance of the enterococcus.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Effects of blood medium supplements on activities of newer cephalosporins tested against enterococci.

Authors:  B J Buschelman; R N Jones; M J Bale
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Enterococcus: not an innocent bystander in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  J-H Lee; J-H Yoon; B H Kim; G E Chung; S J Myung; W Kim; Y J Kim; E-C Kim; H-S Lee
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Influence of the developmental state of valvular lesions on the antimicrobial activity of cefotaxime in experimental enterococcal infections.

Authors:  P M Sullam; T A Drake; M G Täuber; C J Hackbarth; M A Sande
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Potentiation of antibacterial activity of azithromycin and other macrolides by normal human serum.

Authors:  H Pruul; P J McDonald
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Removal Efficiency among Bacteriophage PBEF129, Its Endolysin, and Cefotaxime.

Authors:  Hyun Keun Oh; Yoon Jung Hwang; Hye Won Hong; Heejoon Myung
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 5.048

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.