Literature DB >> 6085377

Efficacy and safety comparison of nitrendipine and hydralazine as antihypertensive monotherapy.

T C Fagan, C Sternleib, N Vlachakis, P C Deedwania, J L Mehta.   

Abstract

One-hundred and five patients with hypertension received nitrendipine (10-40 mg/day) or hydralazine (50-200 mg/day) in a double-blind randomized design. Nitrendipine decreased supine blood pressure 15/10 mm Hg, and hydralazine decreased it 11/11 mm Hg. Standing blood pressure was decreased 15/12 mm Hg by nitrendipine and 12/11 mm Hg by hydralazine. Supine and standing heart rate rose significantly after both drugs. Blood pressure variation through one dosing interval increased 42% when hydralazine was given but was not altered by nitrendipine. Side-effects from the two drugs were similar in patients who completed the study, but six patients discontinued participation due to side-effects of hydralazine, while only one discontinued due to nitrendipine side-effects. Ten patients required propranolol for hydralazine side-effects, and only three required it for nitrendipine side-effects. Nitrendipine and hydralazine are equally effective as antihypertensive monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension for periods up to 7 weeks, but nitrendipine appears to be better tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6085377     DOI: 10.1097/00005344-198400067-00035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol        ISSN: 0160-2446            Impact factor:   3.105


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of casual, ambulatory and self-measured blood pressure in a study of nitrendipine vs bisoprolol.

Authors:  T Mengden; B Bättig; M Schubert; T Jeck; B Weisser; C Buddeberg; W Vetter
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Nitrendipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  K L Goa; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Calcium channel antagonists. Part V: Second-generation agents.

Authors:  L H Opie
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.727

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.