Literature DB >> 6056805

Some statistical treatments compatible with individual organism methodology.

S H Revusky.   

Abstract

Consider experimental treatments with consequences so irreversible that baseline performance cannot be recovered. The conventional method of assessing the effects of such treatments by statistical means involves separate experimental and control groups. An alternative proposed here is to administer the experimental treatment to each subject, one subject at a time and in a random order; whenever any subject receives the experimental treatment, those subjects which have not yet received it receive a control treatment. This procedure permits results significant at the one-tailed 0.05 level to be obtained with four subjects; if a two-group procedure evaluated by means of the U test is used, a minimum of six subjects is needed for the same significance level. More generally, the procedure permits equal sensitivity to any experimental effect with over 30% fewer subjects than a two-group procedure. Extensions of the basic method are made to a variety of levels of the experimental treatment and to treatments without irreversible effects, and limitations of the method are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1967        PMID: 6056805      PMCID: PMC1338288          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  1 in total

1.  A sensitive rank test for comparing the effects of two treatments on a single group.

Authors:  J N Cronholm; S H Revusky
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 2.500

  1 in total
  8 in total

1.  The schism between experimental and applied behavior analysis: Is it real and who cares?

Authors:  A Poling; M Picker; D Grossett; E Hall-Johnson; M Holbrook
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1981

Review 2.  Single-subject research designs and data analyses for assessing elite athletes' conditioning.

Authors:  Taisuke Kinugasa; Ester Cerin; Sue Hooper
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Methodological problems in the use of participant observers.

Authors:  L R Hay; R O Nelson; W M Hay
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1980

4.  A probabilistic model of intensive designs.

Authors:  T F Pechacek
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1978

5.  Teachers and parents as researchers using multiple baseline designs.

Authors:  R V Hall; C Cristler; S S Cranston; B Tucker
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1970

6.  Reducing delusional speech in chronic, paranoid schizophrenics.

Authors:  R P Liberman; J Teigen; R Patterson; V Baker
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1973

7.  Social validation and training of emergency fire safety skills for potential injury prevention and life saving.

Authors:  R T Jones; A E Kazdin; J I Haney
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1981

8.  Randomized Single-Case Intervention Designs and Analyses for Health Sciences Researchers: A Versatile Clinical Trials Companion.

Authors:  Joel R Levin; Thomas R Kratochwill
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 1.778

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.