Literature DB >> 60323

Cytochemical evaluation of the Guard procedure a regressive staining method for demonstrating chromosomal basic proteins. I. Effects of fixation, blocking reactions, selective extractions, and polyacid "differentiation".

R R Cowden, E M Rasch, S K Curtis.   

Abstract

Appropriately fixed preparations stained by a modification of the Guard (1959) reaction for "sex chromatin" display selective staining of interphase chromatin and mitotic or meiotic chromosomes. This is a regressive staining method which seems to depend on the selective displacement of an acidic dye from less basic structures, and retention of the dye at more basic sites. The results obtained with the reaction can be controlled by the length of time that the preparations are "differentiated" in solutions containing phosphomolybdic and phosphotungstic acids (polyacids). After three- or four-hour exposures to polyacid solutions, all chromatin is stained. However, with longer differentiation, "condensed" chromatin can be stained preferentially. Of a number of fixatives investigated, only 10% formalin, ethanol-acetic acid (3:1), and Bouin's solution proved useful. Others resulted in diminished specificity or a total loss of selectivity. The most intense staining was obtained after formalin fixation. Less intense dyebinding was observed after fixation in 3:1 - probably due to extraction of some histone fractions-and the least amount of dye was bound in Bouin's-fixed chromatin - probably due to blockage of arginine residues by picric acid. The reaction was not affected by enzymatic removal of nucleic acids or the extraction of lipids. It was diminished by treatment with trypsin or weak acetylation, and it was completely prevented by strong acetylation, deamination, or extraction of basic proteins with HCl. The results presented suggest that the modified Guard (1959) procedure selectively demonstrates basic nucleoproteins. Further, by the use of regressive differentiation in polyacid solutions, the retention of dye in more condensed chromatin can be favored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 60323     DOI: 10.1007/bf00494546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histochemistry        ISSN: 0301-5564


  17 in total

1.  The possible role of histones in the mechanism of chromosomal G banding.

Authors:  R L Brown; S Pathak; T C Hsu
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Further cytochemical investigations on the growth and development of slug oocytes.

Authors:  R R COWDEN
Journal:  Growth       Date:  1962-09

3.  Microspectrophotometric study of the binding of the anionic dye, naphthol yellow S, by tissue sections and by purified proteins.

Authors:  A D DEITCH
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1955 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.662

4.  A Selective Staining Method for the Basic Proteins of Cell Nuclei.

Authors:  M Alfert; I I Geschwind
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1953-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Microspectrophotometric analysis of basic protein rich sites stained with Biebrich scarlet.

Authors:  S D Douglas; S S Spicer; P H Bartels
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  Mechanisms of chromosome banding. II. Evidence that histones are not involved.

Authors:  D E Comings; E Avelino
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 3.905

7.  Histones in cytological preparations.

Authors:  T Brody
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  Some effects of salts on staining: use of the Donnan equilibrium to describe staining of tissue sections with acid and basic dyes.

Authors:  P J Bennion; R W Horobin
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1974-03-27

9.  Mechanisms of chromosome banding. VI. Whole mount electron microscopy of banded metaphase chromosomes and a comparison with pachytene chromosomes.

Authors:  D E Comings; T A Okada
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 3.905

10.  Measurement of protein concentration by quantitative electron microscopy.

Authors:  L Silverman; D Glick
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.