Literature DB >> 597677

Selective screening for cervical cancer. Experience of the Finnish mass screening system.

M Hakama, E Pukkala.   

Abstract

Names of women eligible to be screened for cervical cancer are taken from the national population registry and the women are invited by a personal letter. The data, from these mass screenings are analysed and stored at the screening registry. To reduced the costs of the system and to increase the yield of preinvasive lesions the idea of selective screening was considered. Tt was decided that if people were selected according to their risk factors, as recorded in the national population registry, the screening would be ineffective as many cases of invasive cancer were found in the low risk groups. High risk factors were determined from anamnestic data on systems and from previous cytological diagnoses. The proportion of women with symptoms of bleeding or the class II-V smears without positive histological results constituted fewer than 10% of the participants, but 20% and 40% respectively of invasive carcinomas were found in these groups during the subsequent follow-up period. Thus it is suggested that selective screening apart from that based on age has a limited application and should be restricted mainly to the interval between the organised screenings, which in Finland is five years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 597677      PMCID: PMC479034          DOI: 10.1136/jech.31.4.238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med        ISSN: 0007-1242


  6 in total

1.  Cancer in Finland 1953-1970: incidence, mortality, prevalence.

Authors:  L Teppo; M Hakama; T Hakulinen; M Lehtonen; E Saxén
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1975

2.  Mass screenings for cervical cancer in Finland 1963-71. Organization, extent, and epidemiological implications.

Authors:  M Hakama; U Joutsenlahti; A Virtanen; U Räsänen-Virtanen
Journal:  Ann Clin Res       Date:  1975-04

3.  Detection of pulmonary tuberculosis by mass RP surveys: a study of their efficacy.

Authors:  M Kannisto
Journal:  Scand J Respir Dis Suppl       Date:  1972

4.  Carcinoma in situ of the cervix in Connecticut. A review, 1949-1962.

Authors:  G W Hulme; H S Eisenberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1968-10-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Response to the written invitation in a gynecological mass screening by cytology arranged in Helsinki in 1966.

Authors:  M A Kauppinen; T Kauraniemi; T Koli; N Voipio
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl       Date:  1970

6.  Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Hakama; U Räsänen-Virtanen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 4.897

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Selective screening: theory and practice based on high-risk groups of cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Hakama; E Pukkala; P Saastamoinen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Prospective evaluation of a risk scoring system for cervical neoplasia in primary care.

Authors:  C E Wilkinson; T J Peters; N C Stott; I M Harvey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  High-risk groups and cervical cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-09-06

Review 4.  A systematic review of postcoital bleeding and risk of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Shapley; Joanne Jordan; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Risk targeting in cervical screening: a new look at an old problem.

Authors:  C E Wilkinson; T J Peters; I M Harvey; N C Stott
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.386

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.