Literature DB >> 5961514

Stimulus generalization: the ordering and spacing of test stimuli.

J G Stevenson.   

Abstract

Twenty-four pigeons learned a successive discrimination between 500 mmu (S+) and 574 mmu (S-). When tested in extinction, some birds received stimuli around S+, with no S- presentations. These birds showed a positive peak shift, with maximum responding not at 550 mmu, but displaced to 538 mmu and 544 mmu. Other birds were tested with stimuli around S-, with no S+ presentations. These birds showed a negative shift, with least responding not at 574 mmu, but at 586 mmu. Though the first group was tested around S+ and the second around S-, total responding between groups did not differ. When retested on the other half of the continuum, however, birds that had gone from the S+ half to the S- half responded fewer times than those that had gone from the S- half to the S+ half. In a second experiment, reducing stimulus spacing from 6 mmu to 2 mmu produced flatter gradients and decreased the amount of positive shift. In a third experiment, birds were tested across the whole continuum with stimuli presented in serial order. A sequence from 538 mmu to 586 mmu produced no responding after the first part of the session; a sequence from 586 mmu to 538 mmu produced responding throughout the session.

Mesh:

Year:  1966        PMID: 5961514      PMCID: PMC1338247          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  The effects of drive and discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  D R THOMAS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-07

2.  Wave-length generalization as a function of spacing of test stimuli.

Authors:  H FRIEDMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-04

3.  Stimulus generalization as a function of testing procedure and response measure.

Authors:  R H HISS; D R THOMAS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-06

4.  Prediction of preference, transposition, and transposition-reversal from the generalization gradient.

Authors:  W K HONIG
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-09

5.  Generalization gradients around stimuli associated with different reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

6.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

7.  Differential effects of continuous extinction and discrimination training on the generalization gradient.

Authors:  W K HONIG; D R THOMAS; N GUTTM AN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-08

8.  Spectral sensitivity in the pigeon.

Authors:  D S BLOUGH
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1957-09

9.  Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Generalization and discrimination as a function of the S-D-S delta intensity difference.

Authors:  R PIERREL; J G SHERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Failure of dieldrin to affect color vision in juvenile mallard ducks.

Authors:  P N Lehner
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Some effects of discriminative training with equated frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  M Yarczower; L R Gollub; J F Dickson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A peak shift on a line-tilt continuum.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.