Literature DB >> 594156

Tonal distinctions in Cantonese.

T J Vance.   

Abstract

The experiment reported here is a perceptual study of the six contrastive tones of Cantonese. The monosyllable was synthesized, and a large number of closely spaced Fo contours were applied to it. Listeners were asked to identify each synthetic stimulus as one of six Cantonese words which all have the segmental shape and differ only in tone. The response data were used to compare two impressionistic accounts of the tonal distinctions and determine which reflects actual Fo more accurately. In general, the results accord fairly well with straightforward predictions made from the impressionistic accounts, but there is one major exception. It appears that something in addition to differences in Fo is involved in distinguishing the low-low tone from the other tones.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 594156     DOI: 10.1159/000259872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phonetica        ISSN: 0031-8388            Impact factor:   1.759


  6 in total

1.  Effect of tonal native language on voice fundamental frequency responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalizations.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Emily Q Wang; Zhaocong Chen; Peng Liu; Charles R Larson; Dongfeng Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: a cross-linguistic comparison.

Authors:  Y S Lee; D A Vakoch; L H Wurm
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-09

Review 3.  The role of the auditory brainstem in processing linguistically-relevant pitch patterns.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Microtonal Variation in Sung Cantonese.

Authors:  Murray Schellenberg; Bryan Gick
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.324

5.  Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone: the roles of language experience and visual information.

Authors:  Amanda Reid; Denis Burnham; Benjawan Kasisopa; Ronan Reilly; Virginie Attina; Nan Xu Rattanasone; Catherine T Best
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Modelling representations in speech normalization of prosodic cues.

Authors:  Chen Si; Caicai Zhang; Puiyin Lau; Yike Yang; Bei Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.