Literature DB >> 5939142

Stochastic models of choice behaviour: response probabilities and latencies of finite Markov chain systems.

A R Pike.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1966        PMID： 5939142     DOI： 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1966.tb00351.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN： 0007-1102            Impact factor:   3.380


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Dual diffusion model for single-cell recording data from the superior colliculus in a brightness-discrimination task.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Yukako T Hasegawa; Ryohei P Hasegawa; Philip L Smith; Mark A Segraves
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Modeling reaction time and accuracy of multiple-alternative decisions.

Authors:  Fábio P Leite; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Mechanisms underlying the influence of saliency on value-based decisions.

Authors:  Xiaomo Chen; Stefan Mihalas; Ernst Niebur; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The effects of evidence bounds on decision-making: theoretical and empirical developments.

Authors:  Jiaxiang Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-01

7.  The 2N-ary Choice Tree Model for N-Alternative Preferential Choice.

Authors:  Lena M Wollschläger; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-20

8.  Comparing quantum versus Markov random walk models of judgements measured by rating scales.

Authors:  Z Wang; J R Busemeyer
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Markov versus quantum dynamic models of belief change during evidence monitoring.

Authors:  Jerome R Busemeyer; Peter D Kvam; Timothy J Pleskac
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.