Literature DB >> 593888

Urea-induced structural changes in chromatin obtained by sedimentation.

R E Harrington.   

Abstract

Sedimentation coefficients have been determined for fractionated preparations of whole and stripped (depleted of very lysine-rich histones and non-histone proteins) chicken erythrocyte chromatin fragments in 0-10 M urea. Significant differences in urea effects are observed between these preparations; differences which can be interpreted structurally by use of Kirkwood's dynamical theory of the translational frictional coefficient. This type of analysis implies that urea-induced chain-swelling in stripped chromatin is due largely to the urea effect upon the constituent nu-bodies, whereas the much larger swelling observed in whole chromatin appears to involve also the effect of urea upon the region between adjacent nu-bodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 593888      PMCID: PMC343202          DOI: 10.1093/nar/4.11.3821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  22 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal proteins and chromatin structure.

Authors:  S C Elgin; H Weintraub
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Chromatin nu bodies: isolation, subfractionation and physical characterization.

Authors:  A L Olins; R D Carlson; E B Wright; D E Olins
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Persistence of the ten-nucleotide repeat in chromatin unfolded in urea, as revealed by digestion with deoxyribonuclease i.

Authors:  M Yaneva; G Dessev
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Preparation and physical characterization of a homogeneous population of monomeric nucleosomes from HeLa cells.

Authors:  J P Whitlock; R T Simpson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Quasielastic light scattering by biopolymers. Conformation of chromatin multimers.

Authors:  B R Shaw; K S Schmitz
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1976-11-22       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Conformational states of chromatin nu bodies induced by urea.

Authors:  D E Olins; P N Bryan; R E Harrington; W E Hill; A L Olins
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Action of micrococcal nuclease on chromatin and the location of histone H1.

Authors:  M Noll; R D Kornberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-01-25       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Conformational changes of histones and DNA during the thermal denaturation of nucleoprotein.

Authors:  F X Wilhelm; G M de Murcia; M H Champagne; M P Daune
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1974-06-15

9.  A comparison of the structure of chicken erythrocyte and chicken liver chromatin.

Authors:  N R Morris
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Salt and divalent cations affect the flexible nature of the natural beaded chromatin structure.

Authors:  G Christiansen; J Griffith
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.