Literature DB >> 592915

A controlled trial of the impact of the family practice nurse on volume, quality, and cost of rural health services.

L W Chambers, P Bruce-Lockhart, D P Black, E Sampson, M Burke.   

Abstract

Rural Newfoundland communities with and without expanded role nurses were compared on a before and after basis. The rural communities are located in a geographically isolated area served by a 40-bed hospital staffed by salaried physicians. Primary care visits within the community increased by 186 per cent after establishment of the family practice nurse community clinic and attendance at the hospital decreased by 35 per cent. Acute care days in hospital decreased 5 per cent in the experimental group and increased by 39 per cent in the control group. A major portion of the community based visits provided to the experimental group were classed as preventive. The total annual health service cost per 1,000 persons in the experimental group increased slightly more than in the control group (26 versus 21 per cent). Adequate management of certain indicator conditions and drugs was maintained by the family practice nurse when compared to the adequacy rating for the physician during the same time period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 592915     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-197712000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  6 in total

1.  Health problems encountered by three levels of providers in a remote setting.

Authors:  E V Dunn; C A Higgins
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Impact of the rural health clinics services bill: a projection.

Authors:  F P Rivara
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1980

3.  Who should promote health and provide preventive care? A cautionary note.

Authors:  H A Southall
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Quality of care provided by mid-level health workers: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zohra S Lassi; Giorgio Cometto; Luis Huicho; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 5.  A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists: what is the quality of the evidence?

Authors:  Faith Donald; Kelley Kilpatrick; Kim Reid; Nancy Carter; Ruth Martin-Misener; Denise Bryant-Lukosius; Patricia Harbman; Sharon Kaasalainen; Deborah A Marshall; Renee Charbonneau-Smith; Erin E Donald; Monique Lloyd; Abigail Wickson-Griffiths; Jennifer Yost; Pamela Baxter; Esther Sangster-Gormley; Pamela Hubley; Célyne Laflamme; Marsha Campbell-Yeo; Sheri Price; Jennifer Boyko; Alba DiCenso
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2014-09-01

Review 6.  Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care.

Authors:  Miranda Laurant; Mieke van der Biezen; Nancy Wijers; Kanokwaroon Watananirun; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Anneke Jah van Vught
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.