Literature DB >> 5918709

Use of oral contraception in the United States, 1965. In only 5 years oral contraception has become a major means of regulating fertility.

N B Ryder, C F Westoff.   

Abstract

This is the first report from the Na-tional Fertility Study, 1965, a survey of the reproductive behavior of a national sample of married women, under the age of 55, living with their husbands. The report presents basic data on the use of oral contraception by women under the age of 45, in relation to age, parity, education, race, and religion. The study leads to certain conclusions, as follows. Present, past, and prospective use vary inversely with the age of the woman and directly with the number of years of schooling; the majority of young women with college training have already used the oral contraceptive. Use by Negroes is somewhat less extensive than use by whites, particularly for ages below 25; some of this difference is explainable by concomitant racial differences in educational level. Negroes seem less likely than whites to use oral contraception for timing early births, and more likely, when they do use it, to be attempting to terminate their fertility. The same observation holds for white Catholics in relation to white non-Catholics. Although the extent of use may be lower among Catholics than non-Catholics, the proportion of Catholics who report use is substantial indeed in view of the persisting theological controversy. The prospects for increased use of oral contraception seem very good at present, but they may be limited by further developments in the technology of fertility regulation. Meanwhile the birth rate has declined substantially. Although much sophisticated analysis of other data from the survey will be required to determine the extent of the contribution of oral contraception to this decline, the findings presented here suggest that the contribution is substantial for young married couples. The major effect on the couple's eventual number of children may be less than the effect on the time pattern of childbearing; in any event, both lower eventual parity and delayed fertility contribute to a decline in the numbers of births from year to year. Whatever the intent may be, it is apparent that young American couples have adopted a new means for achieving their reproductive goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1966        PMID: 5918709     DOI: 10.1126/science.153.3741.1199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  10 in total

1.  The growth of American families studies an assessment of significance.

Authors:  C V Kiser
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1967-03

2.  Reexamining the link of early childbearing to marriage and to subsequent fertility.

Authors:  S P Morgan; R R Rindfuss
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1999-02

3.  Duration of use of oral contraception in the United States, 1960-65.

Authors:  C F Westoff; N B Ryder
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Epidemiology of exogenous estrogens.

Authors:  R E Markush; S L Turner
Journal:  HSMHA Health Rep       Date:  1971-01

5.  An epidemiological analysis of abortion in Georgia.

Authors:  R W Rochat; C W Tyler; A K Schoenbucher
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Thromboembolism, oral contraceptives, and cigarettes.

Authors:  H Frederiksen; R T Ravenholt
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 7.  Hormonal steroid contraceptives. II. Clinical considerations.

Authors:  G C Liggins
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  General population estimates of the association between college experience and the odds of forced intercourse.

Authors:  William George Axinn; Maura Elaine Bardos; Brady Thomas West
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2017-10-31

9.  Door-to-door canvassing as a means of family planning patient recruitment.

Authors:  W Cates; V H Pedersen; N N O'Brien
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1969-08

10.  Surrogates of long-term vitamin d exposure and ovarian cancer risk in two prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Jennifer Prescott; Kimberly A Bertrand; Elizabeth M Poole; Bernard A Rosner; Shelley S Tworoger
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.