| Literature DB >> 591135 |
A Goldstein, W H Horns, R W Hansteen.
Abstract
Patients in a methadone maintenance clinic were randomly assigned to two groups: one to have urine tests on-site (by the EMIT system) with immediate feedback of results to patients and staff; the other to have urine specimens sent away to an offsite laboratory for testing by thin-layer chromatography. Although other advantages might justify the adoption of on-site testing in methadone programs, the method appeared to have little or no therapeutic advantage over customary off-site testing. There were negligibly small differences between the groups with respect to illicit drug use.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1977 PMID: 591135 DOI: 10.3109/10826087709024121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Addict ISSN: 0020-773X