Literature DB >> 589350

Long-term prognosis of duodenal ulcer: follow-up study and survey of doctors' estimates.

J Greibe, P Bugge, T Gjorup, T Lauritzen, O Bonnevie, H R Wulff.   

Abstract

In 1976 we reviewed a randomly selected cohort of 227 patients with duodenal ulcer first diagnosed in 1963. The cohort comprised cases diagnosed in both hospitals and general practice. Fifty patients had died, 12 had emigrated, and 154 (93%) of the remaining patients were interviewed. Fifty-seven medically treated patients had no symptoms, 44 had mild symptoms, and 19 had more severe symptoms. The remaining 34 patients had been treated surgically. Cases diagnosed in hospital had a more severe prognosis than those diagnosed in general practice. A random sample of 65 general practitioners and 78 medical and surgical gastroenterologists tried to predict the results of this study. The range of the predictions was very wide showing that individual prognostic estimates were highly unreliable. The mean prediction by all doctors differed little from the actual result, suggesting that the collective experience of the medical profession is more reliable. The predictions of general practitioners, physicians, and surgeons showed small systematic differences, presumably reflecting the different types of patients they treat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 589350      PMCID: PMC1632687          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.6102.1572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  5 in total

1.  PEPTIC ULCER: A PROFILE.

Authors:  J FRY
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1964-09-26

2.  The incidence of gastric ulcer in Copenhagen county.

Authors:  O Bonnevie
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  Unrestricted diet in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  E Buchman; D T Kaung; K Dolan; R N Knapp
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  The incidence of duodenal ulcer in Copenhagen county.

Authors:  O Bonnevie
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  A controlled trial of glycopyrronium and l-hyoscyamine in the long-term treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  M D Kaye; J Rhodes; P Beck; P M Sweetnam; G T Davies; K T Evans
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 23.059

  5 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Current therapy in peptic ulcer.

Authors:  I N Marks
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Drugs for the prevention of peptic ulcer recurrence.

Authors:  D W Piper
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Audit of the outcome of peptic ulcer disease diagnosed 10 to 20 years previously.

Authors:  J A Malliwah; M Tabaqchali; J Watson; C W Venables
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Gastric atrophy, diagnosing and staging.

Authors:  Hala M T El-Zimaity
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Long term treatment of duodenal ulcer. A review of management options.

Authors:  G Bianchi Porro; F Parente
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Prophylactic effect of cimetidine in duodenal ulcer disease.

Authors:  E Gudmand-Høyer; K B Jensen; E Krag; J Rask-Madsen; I Rahbek; S J Rune; H R Wulff
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-04-29

7.  Dyspepsia: is a trial of therapy appropriate?

Authors:  W G Thompson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Complications associated with ulcer recurrence following gastric surgery for ulcer disease.

Authors:  J G Penston; E J Boyd; K G Wormsley
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1992-02

Review 9.  Complementarity of Clinician Judgment and Evidence Based Models in Medical Decision Making: Antecedents, Prospects, and Challenges.

Authors:  Zhou Lulin; Ethel Yiranbon; Henry Asante Antwi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.