Literature DB >> 5832861

Functional relation between stimulus intensity and photically evoked cerebral responses in man.

H G Vaughan, R C Hull.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1965        PMID： 5832861     DOI： 10.1038/206720a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Influence of the Pulfrich phenomenon on driving performance.

Authors:  Armin Breyer; Xiaoyi Jiang; Adrian Rütsche; Hanspeter Bieri; Thomas Oexl; Ann Baumann; Daniel S Mojon
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Two-stage model of visual backward masking: sensory transmission and accrual of effective information as a function of target intensity and similarity.

Authors:  J G Muise; R S LeBlanc; M E Lavoie; A S Arsenault
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-09

3.  The cruciform model of striate generation of the early VEP, re-illustrated, not revoked: a reply to Ales et al. (2013).

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; M Isabel Vanegas; Charles E Schroeder; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  [The off effect of the visual evoked potential in man under various conditions].

Authors:  H Emrich; E Lohse-Streek
Journal:  Dtsch Z Nervenheilkd       Date:  1969

5.  [Stimulus intensity dependency and Stevens power function in the human evoked optical potential].

Authors:  V von Loewenich; P Finkenzeller
Journal:  Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere       Date:  1967

6.  [Evoked potentials produced by discontinuous light stimuli in man. Gestalt theory of evoked potentials].

Authors:  H Emrich
Journal:  Z Neurol       Date:  1970

7.  Changes in perceived contrast, reaction time, and pattern-specific evoked potentials due to stimulus duration.

Authors:  I Czigler; M Tölgyesi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-11

8.  Cortical responses to light in unanesthetized monkeys and their alteration by visual system lesions.

Authors:  H G Vaughan; C G Gross
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Low luminance/eyes closed and monochromatic stimulations reduce variability of flash visual evoked potential latency.

Authors:  Senthil Kumar Subramanian; Giriwar Singh Gaur; Sunil K Narayan
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.383

10.  Visual Evoked Potential Using Head-Mounted Display Versus Cathode Ray Tube: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Hyo Seon Choi; Sang Hee Im; Yong Kyun Kim; Sang Chul Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-04-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.