Literature DB >> 582211

Arthrography of the knee: a comparative study of the accuracy of single and double contrast techniques.

C J Tegtmeyer, F C McCue, S M Higgins, D W Ball.   

Abstract

Single and double contrast arthrographic techniques were compared in 951 patinets with suspected meniscal injuries. Exploratory surgery of the knee was performed in 384 of these patients and good clinical follow-up was obtained in 135 patients. In the latter two groups of patients, the single contrast technique was 97% accurate in assessing the medial meniscus and 96% accurate in assessing the lateral meniscus. Double contrast arthrography was 97% accurate in assessing the medial meniscus and 93% accurate in assessing the lateral meniscus. Numerical differences in the results from the two techniques were not statistically significant. Therefore both techniques can be considered equally effective diagnostically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 582211     DOI: 10.1148/132.1.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

1.  [Arthrograph and operative findings (author's transl)].

Authors:  H Vogel; D Hornung; K H Jungbluth
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1981-08

2.  Accuracy of double-contrast arthrography and arthroscopy of the knee joint.

Authors:  C J Thijn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Meniscal tears on knee arthrography: patterns of arthrographic abnormalities.

Authors:  A A De Smet
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Diagnosis of equine stifle joint disorders: three cases.

Authors:  M R Desjardins; M B Hurtig
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.008

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.