Literature DB >> 579084

[The importance of the "contingent negative variation" (CNV) for audiometry (author's transl)].

R Brix.   

Abstract

Previous proofs of "central processes" in hearing were based on the determination of the late "auditory evoked potentials" (AEP's: 50--300 ms) in EEG. The appearance of AEP's in different sleep stages raises the question, if the AEP actually conscious hearing. Since the discovery of the "Contingent Negative Variation" (CNV), as a potential depending on conscious and cognitive factors, an appropriate "instrument" is available to solve this problem. Using the CNV-technique three proofs of central auditory perception are described and discussed: a) "The objective proof of the perception of pure-tones", useful for threshold determination, test in the case of simulation and central hearing disorders. b) "The objective proof of the perception of stimulus-changes", useful for exact determination of differential thresholds for frequencies or intensities. c) "The objective speech audiometry", proof of speech comprehension, useful in case of aphasia and simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 579084     DOI: 10.1007/bf00465545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0302-9530


  27 in total

1.  NATURE OF AVERAGE EVOKED POTENTIALS TO SOUND AND OTHER STIMULI IN MAN.

Authors:  R G BICKFORD; J L JACOBSON; D T CODY
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1964-05-08       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  The objective of verbal discrimination ability further investigations.

Authors:  R Brix; K Burian
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1973 Sep-Dec

3.  Motivational determinants of the "contingent negative variation".

Authors:  D A Irwin; J R Knott; D W McAdam; C S Rebert
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1966-12

4.  The effects of attention and distraction on the contingent negative variation in normal and neurotic subjects.

Authors:  W C McCallum; W G Walter
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-10

5.  [The DC component of acoustically evoked potentials and its dependence upon mental alertness (author's transl)].

Authors:  U Büchele; C F Seiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Event related slow potential changes in human brain stem.

Authors:  W C McCallum; D Papakostopoulos; R Gombi; A L Winter; R Cooper; H B Griffith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  [Cochlear potentials obtained in human beings aside from all surgical intervention. Preliminary note].

Authors:  M Portmann; G Le Bert; J M Aran
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  1967 Mar-Apr

8.  What do we know about the human cortical evoked potential after all?

Authors:  W D Keidel
Journal:  Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1971

9.  Auditory-evoked responses in normal, brain-damaged, and deaf infants.

Authors:  I Rapin; L J Graziani
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Non-surgical recording of auditory nerve action potentials in man.

Authors:  N Yoshie; T Ohashi; T Suzuki
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  1 in total

1.  [The objectivation of auditory and optical imaginations in the electroencephalogramm (author's transl)].

Authors:  R Brix
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1978-01-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.